star-atlas
Star Atlas DAO
POLIS
$0.17

Sector

Gaming

Exchange Debut

2021-09-02

Market Cap

43,629,803

Maxim Supply

360,000,000

Circulating Supply

255,124,355

Circ. Supply(%)

70.87%
star-atlas

Star Atlas DAO

POLIS

Price

$0.17

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

43,629,803
2021-09-02

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

288168
0.181692428894
0.17090117966

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

-4.2036
-16.2191
-22.5558

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

360,000,000
255,124,355
70.87%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Star Atlas DAO-POLIS cryptocurrency:

 

Star Atlas DAO – POLIS emerges as a groundbreaking project at the intersection of advanced blockchain, real-time graphics, and decentralized financial technologies. It leverages Unreal Engine 5’s Nanite for stunning visuals and the Solana protocol for secure, serverless gameplay, integrating NFTs to mimic real-world asset tangibility. With a comprehensive fundamental analysis of the Star Atlas DAO – POLIS cryptocurrency, the project scores an overall 6.90 out of 10, reflecting its diverse strengths and areas for improvement.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 8.2 out of 10

The project excels in social and media presence, scoring an impressive 8.2. Its ability to attract followers and media presence is top-notch (both scoring 10), signifying a strong brand and community engagement. However, community activity on social media is moderate (score 5), indicating potential for more interactive engagement.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 3.05 out of 10

Audit and security aspects are a concern, with a low score of 3.05. While transparency is reasonably high (score 7), the results of audits and liquidity on exchanges are weak (scores 2 and 4 respectively), suggesting significant room for improvement in these critical areas.

TOKENOMICS: Score 8.2 out of 10

The token economy is robust, scoring 8.2. The project’s approach to inflation (score 10) and a moderately centralized monetary mass (score 6) demonstrate a balanced and sustainable economic model.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 6.8 out of 10

In ecosystem development, the project earns a 6.8. Achieving objectives and planning new developments are on track (scores 7 and 6 respectively), indicating steady progress but also room for more dynamic growth.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 7.6 out of 10

The team’s expertise is notable (score 7.5), complemented by a strong pool of software developers (score 8). This foundation bodes well for ongoing and future project developments.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 7.2 out of 10

Product utility is solid, scoring 7.2. The product’s utility is high (score 8), though the token’s role in the ecosystem could be enhanced (score 6), suggesting potential for further integration and application.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 5.75 out of 10

Partners and investors contribute moderately (score 5.75). The number and capacity of investors, as well as the quality of partners, are average (scores 5 and 6.5), indicating a need for stronger collaborations and investor relations.

Fundamental analysis of the Star Atlas-DAO cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

In summary, the fundamental analysis of the Star Atlas DAO – POLIS cryptocurrency reveals a project with strong technological foundations and community engagement, counterbalanced by areas needing improvement in security and partnerships. Its innovative approach in blending gaming with blockchain technology presents an intriguing investment opportunity. However, the relatively lower scores in audit, security, and partnerships introduce risk factors that should be carefully considered by potential investors. With a final score of 6.90, Star Atlas DAO – POLIS shows promise but also highlights the importance of ongoing development and strategic enhancements to achieve its full potential.

What is Star Atlas DAO?

 

Star Atlas DAO represents an innovative gaming metaverse, blending blockchain, real-time graphics, multiplayer gaming, and decentralized finance. The project utilizes Unreal Engine 5 for cinematic-quality visuals and Solana’s blockchain for a secure, serverless gameplay experience. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) within Star Atlas create a real-world-like economy of assets and ownership.

The Setting and Factions of Star Atlas

Set in 2620, Star Atlas features three main factions: the human-governed MUD Territory, the alien consortium ONI Region, and the android-controlled Ustur Sector. Players, as faction citizens, engage in a struggle for resources, territory, and political dominance, influencing the intergalactic conflict.

Gameplay Mechanics and Blockchain Integration

Star Atlas mirrors blockchain principles through its gameplay, with mining and staking as core mechanics. Players explore space to discover and mine assets. This mirrors blockchain’s asset verification process. The game combines traditional gaming and blockchain mechanics, offering a grand strategy genre experience. Players claim territories, establish trade routes, and execute tactical plans.

Player Interaction and Exploration

Players interact with the game universe primarily through a map view of space, exploring charted and uncharted regions. Deep-space missions involve captaining spaceships, discovering celestial bodies, and mining resources. Exploration leads to unexpected discoveries in outer space.

Economy and Career Opportunities

Mining is central to Star Atlas’s economy, spawning various revenue streams. Players can trade resources, haul cargo, and craft components, choosing from diverse career paths. This variety allows for specialization and career advancement within the game.

Immersive Experience and Technology

The game offers an immersive first-person view for exploration and combat, enhancing the sense of ownership over spacecraft. Compatible with VR headsets and flightstick controls, Star Atlas offers a realistic space adventure experience, allowing players to manually pilot their ships.

Fundamental analysis of the Star Atlas DAO-POLIS cryptocurrency

Star Atlas DAO-POLIS performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

SCORE: 7.24
RATING: Good
Pixels - logo
SCORE: 7.42
RATING: Good
Heroes of Mavia - logo
SCORE: 6.65
RATING: Good
playdapp
SCORE: 5.17
RATING: Average
beam logo
SCORE: 5.55
RATING: Average
playdapp
SCORE: 6.30
RATING: Good
metacade logo
SCORE: 6.43
RATING: Good
Big Time logo
SCORE: 4.65
RATING: Average
yield guild games logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
logo games for a living
SCORE: 6.13
RATING: Good
Logo Hello Labs
SCORE: 6.47
RATING: Good
Enjin coin logo
SCORE: 8.40
RATING: Excellent
SCORE: 6.39
RATING: Good
Gala - logo
SCORE: 7.65
RATING: Good
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
TNC Coin -Logo
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average