Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 51.16% | Volume (24h): $36,992,748,770 | Market Cap: $2,189,479,499,909
Vibing
VBG
N/A
Sector
Web 3.0
Exchange Debut
2022-09-29
Market Cap
N/A
Maxim Supply
N/A
Circulating Supply
N/A
Circ. Supply(%)
Vibing
VBG
Price
N/A
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
N/A
N/A
N/A
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
N/A
N/A
N/A
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
N/A
N/A
The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Vibing cryptocurrency:
Vibing, a novel Web3.0 personal homepage, is an ambitious venture built entirely on blockchain technology. Its main goal is to serve as a platform for personal data generation and integration, establishing itself as the starting point for individuals aiming to access the Web3 network and the gateway to the metaverse. Despite this promising premise, the fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Vibing reveals a final score of 2.96 out of 10. Now, let’s delve into a detailed exploration of each criterion.
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 2.7 out of 10
Despite its innovative approach, Vibing hasn’t managed to create a significant buzz on social media platforms, reflected in a low score of 2.7 out of 10 for this criterion. Its capacity to attract followers, social media administrators’ activities, and presence in media were particularly weak, although community activity on social media pages and size of communities on chat groups somewhat compensated for these low ratings.
AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 4.65 out of 10
When it comes to the audit and security dimension, Vibing scores a modest 4.65 out of 10. Despite having acceptable audit results, Vibing’s transparency and liquidity on the exchange are areas that need immediate attention, as per the fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Vibing.
TOKENOMICS: Score 3.5 out of 10
In terms of tokenomics, Vibing’s score falls to 3.5 out of 10. Both inflationary tendencies of the project and the degree of centralization in its monetary mass were found to be suboptimal, reflecting a significant room for improvement.
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 3.2 out of 10
The ecosystem development aspect of Vibing is another area that requires attention, with a score of 3.2 out of 10. Although the team plans to bring new developments to the project, their achievement of objectives so far has been relatively moderate.
TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 1 out of 10
A significant concern in the fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Vibing is the team’s lack of experience and a small number of software developers, both scoring a low 1 out of 10. This raises questions about the team’s ability to deliver on the project’s ambitious goals.
PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 2.6 out of 10
The utility of the Vibing product and its tokens in the ecosystem, while not entirely dismissible, doesn’t stand out, as evidenced by a score of 2.6 out of 10. Future efforts should focus on enhancing the usability and application of both the product and the tokens.
PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 3 out of 10
Finally, in terms of partners and investors, Vibing scores 3 out of 10. The number and capacity of investors, as well as the quality of partnerships, have been lackluster so far and need to be improved.
Fundamental analysis of the Vibing cryptocurrency – The final conclusion
In conclusion, the fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Vibing reveals a project with potential but one that is currently struggling to realize it. The low scores across most of the categories indicate significant room for improvement and suggest that Vibing may carry considerable risk at this time.
Given the team’s limited experience and the modest token economy, as well as issues related to audit and security, it is crucial for potential investors to exercise caution. On the brighter side, the project’s innovative idea of a personal homepage on the Web3 network, if executed well, could offer a unique investment opportunity in the burgeoning realm of the metaverse.
However, the project’s current status doesn’t seem to offer a compelling investment case, according to the fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Vibing. The team needs to make substantial improvements in areas like social media engagement, transparency, liquidity on exchange, and notably, in the overall experience and size of the team itself.
The promise of the Web3 network and the burgeoning interest in metaverse projects could provide a fertile ground for Vibing to grow, but only if the team successfully addresses the identified issues. For investors, it’s vital to monitor Vibing’s progress in these areas closely, as improvements could potentially lead to a revision of its current risk and investment potential profile.
Therefore, at present, the potential investment in Vibing comes with a significant risk. However, with strategic improvements and focused development, Vibing could evolve into a viable project within the dynamic cryptocurrency space. As always, prospective investors are advised to conduct their own thorough research and consider their risk tolerance before investing in such projects.
In sum, the fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Vibing reveals a project with untapped potential that is currently overshadowed by significant challenges and risks. The future of Vibing will largely depend on how well and how quickly the team can address these concerns and implement needed improvements.
Vibing’s Web3 Revolution: Fundamental Analysis of Vibing Cryptocurrency
Network Identity System Revolution
Vibing Web3 redefines the identification process by replacing the conventional „account + password” system. It employs a distributed digital identity (Decentralized ID, DID), empowering users with ultimate control over their identity, social connections, and property. It paves the way for unified identity authorization across various platforms, safeguarding user privacy and preventing data breaches.
The Property Rights Revolution
The essence of Vibing’s Ecological Construction lies in leveraging Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) for property rights security. Centralized platforms become unnecessary, and NFTs, which cannot be coded, provide robust protection for user property rights. This shift significantly reduces costs related to defining, transferring, and protecting assets. As a result, User Generated Content (UGC) can be traded smoothly, serving as a cornerstone for the Metaverse project.
Overturning Centralized Platforms
Vibing promotes a rebellion against centralized platforms. Blockchain technology forms the backbone, enabling a logical incentive and governance mechanism to counter the information and capital monopoly of centralized entities. In this context, platform supremacy faces considerable challenges, promoting an environment where the value derived from content creation and production incentivizes participants. Moreover, the monopolization of information by search engines can be effectively curbed.
Revolutionizing Privacy and Personal Data Protection
Vibing provides comprehensive data protection through blockchain’s inherent features like anonymization and de-trusting. It also supports decentralized trading and messaging, thus blocking central platforms that intrude on user privacy. These attributes suggest an upcoming transformation and evolution of the traditional Web2 business model.
A New Era in Business Models
The business model revolution is a key aspect of the fundamental analysis of Vibing cryptocurrency. Contributors and content creators can rightfully claim the value they generate. NFTs are freely created and exchanged, and DAO serves as the governance mechanism. This revolution extends to diversifying Defi’s business and collaboration model, with DAO also acting as the governance mechanism.
- Latest analysis update: June 14, 2023
Vibing - VBG performance
GENERAL CRITERIA:
Score
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Go to Methodology
Content description
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
