Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 49.10% | Volume (24h): $32,685,163,097 | Market Cap: $2,449,051,620,912
Projects listed: 276 |
Sector
Exchange Debut
Market Cap
Maxim Supply
Circulating Supply
Circ. Supply(%)
Price
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
Metars Genesis, a pioneering project striving to meld artistry and spirituality in a revolutionary metaverse, embodies a crystallization of human civilization through the application of VR technology. In its ambition to showcase the most sublime works of art and profound religious enlightenment, it seeks to build a free, open world. The ambitious nature of this project, however, seems to be at odds with the results of a fundamental analysis of the Metars Genesis cryptocurrency. Despite its innovative concept, Metars Genesis scores a rather underwhelming 3.2 out of 10. This score is indicative of the project’s struggles across various criteria, from social media presence and security to the strength of its team and token utility.
The project’s social and mass media presence leaves much to be desired, scoring only 3.5 out of 10. This score reflects Metars Genesis’ average ability to attract followers on social media platforms and its moderate media presence. However, the low level of activity by administrators on these platforms and the limited engagement from the community are areas of concern. Given the importance of social media in today’s world, particularly for a virtual platform like Metars Genesis, improvements in this area are crucial for the project’s growth and success.
Metars Genesis received a slightly higher score of 5.5 out of 10 in the audit and security analysis. The project’s audit results were positive, but issues arose with the transparency of information available to the public and the lack of liquidity on exchanges. These weaknesses suggest the need for greater transparency and efforts to enhance liquidity to strengthen the security aspect of the project.
The tokenomics of Metars Genesis cryptocurrency is another area where the project struggles, receiving a mere 2.05 out of 10. With concerns about the project’s inflationary nature and the centralization of its monetary mass, the tokenomics score indicates fundamental challenges that could inhibit the project’s scalability and success in the crypto market.
The development of the Metars Genesis ecosystem has been somewhat lackluster, as indicated by its score of 3.4 out of 10. This evaluation considers the project’s accomplishments to date and its plans for future developments. The relatively low score suggests room for improvement in both of these areas.
The team behind Metars Genesis has received a disappointingly low score of 1.8 out of 10. This score reflects concerns about the team’s overall experience and the number of software developers involved in the project. A robust, experienced team is essential for a project of this magnitude and complexity, suggesting a need for bolstering the project’s personnel.
With a score of 3.8 out of 10, the utility of the Metars Genesis product and its tokens within the ecosystem have received mixed evaluations. While the product itself is considered somewhat useful, the utility of its tokens in the ecosystem is found wanting.
Lastly, the score of 2 out of 10 in the partners and investors category underscores a need for Metars Genesis to secure more significant investment and partnership opportunities. The current investors and partners do not appear to provide enough support or resources to fuel the project’s ambitious goals.
In light of the fundamental analysis of the Metars Genesis cryptocurrency, the project presents a risk-heavy investment opportunity, as evidenced by its overall score of 3.2 out of 10.
Overall, the fundamental analysis of the Metars Genesis cryptocurrency reveals a project that is still in its nascent stages, struggling with challenges across multiple facets. Yet, its unique blend of art and spirituality in a virtual world lends the project a certain novelty that, if leveraged effectively, could pave the way for future success.
In conclusion, potential investors should monitor the progress of Metars Genesis closely, particularly its efforts to enhance its social media presence, secure more liquidity on exchanges, improve token utility, expand its team of developers, and attract more significant investment and partnerships. As the fundamental analysis of the Metars Genesis cryptocurrency indicates, while the project is fraught with risk, its unique concept could make it a promising venture in the long term.
Metars stands as a distinctive merger of art gallery and religious site within the metaverse world. The initiative seeks to epitomize human civilization through the lens of virtual reality (VR) technology. The end-goal revolves around showcasing the most profound works of art in human history, bearing religious, divine, and human enlightenment values.
VR technology is instrumental in creating a crystalline representation of human civilization in Metars. The digital stage set by VR will display historical artistic works, reverberating with spiritual undertones, thereby promoting an environment of divine and human enlightenment.
Metars is envisioned to evolve into a fully free open world. This transformation will be facilitated through the collaborative efforts of all its residents. As a collective, the inhabitants will co-construct this unique environment, marking Metars’ growth as a reflection of communal input. The fundamental analysis of the Metars Genesis cryptocurrency suggests a crucial role in its evolution.
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Name | Domain | Purpose | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
_ga | coin-score.ai | Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. | 2 years | HTTP |
Name | Domain | Purpose | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
_ga_QJD5B840TY | coin-score.ai | --- | 2 years | --- |