analos logo
analoS
ANALOS
$0.00

Sector

Meme

Exchange Debut

2024-01-22

Market Cap

7,182,756

Maxim Supply

100,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

98,619,280,762

Circ. Supply(%)

98.62%
analos logo

analoS

ANALOS

Price

$0.00

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

7,182,756
2024-01-22

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

4972465
7.6265746E-5
6.8180379E-5

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

5.0958
-20.3543
-33.2189

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

100,000,000,000
98,619,280,762
98.62%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the analoS cryptocurrency:

 

AnaloS, a cryptocurrency project, has garnered attention for its remarkable journey from obscurity to prominence, followed by an expected downturn, indicative of its nature as a “shitcoin.” Despite lacking a whitepaper and anonymity of its founders, AnaloS managed to capture significant interest, peaking through airdrops and social media trends before facing a substantial retrace. The fundamental analysis of the analoS – ANALOS cryptocurrency reveals a mixed performance across various criteria, leading to a final score of 4.29 out of 10. This analysis aims to dissect the project’s strengths and weaknesses across several domains to offer a comprehensive view of its potential and risks.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 4.8 out of 10

The project demonstrates moderate success in social media engagement, with a notable ability to grow its community size, especially in chat groups. However, the activities of social media administrators and community activity on social media pages could see improvement. The presence in the media remains minimal, indicating a need for more robust marketing strategies to enhance visibility and engagement.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 5.25 out of 10

Audit and security aspects of AnaloS show a slightly above-average performance with a decent audit score, suggesting some attention to security measures. Nonetheless, transparency issues and limited liquidity on exchanges highlight areas for improvement, essential for building trust and ensuring a secure investment environment.

TOKENOMICS: Score 7.35 out of 10

AnaloS shines in its token economy, presenting an inflationary model with controlled inflation rates, which received a high score. The monetary mass’s centralization level is moderate, suggesting a balanced approach to token distribution. This area represents a strong point for AnaloS, indicating potential for sustainable economic growth.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 2.2 out of 10

Ecosystem development is a significant weakness for AnaloS, with minimal achievements towards set objectives and lack of new developments. This area requires significant attention to ensure long-term viability and competitiveness in the crowded cryptocurrency market.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 2.1 out of 10

The team behind AnaloS lacks experience, and the number of software developers is below expectations. This aspect raises concerns about the project’s ability to execute its vision and deliver on its promises, highlighting a crucial area for improvement.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 4.2 out of 10

While the utility of tokens within the ecosystem is recognized, the overall utility of the product is low. Enhancing the product’s utility could significantly impact the project’s value proposition and appeal to a broader audience.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 4.5 out of 10

The project has managed to attract a reasonable number of investors, but the quality and number of partners remain underwhelming. Strengthening these relationships could provide valuable resources and credibility to AnaloS.

Fundamental analysis of the analoS – ANALOS cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

The fundamental analysis of the analoS – ANALOS cryptocurrency unveils a project with a volatile start and considerable challenges ahead. While tokenomics presents a silver lining, areas such as ecosystem development, team expertise, and product utility significantly hinder its potential. The project’s moderate success in attracting a community and some investor interest suggests a foundation to build upon. However, without addressing critical weaknesses, especially in transparency, development, and team capability, the risk for investors remains high. This analysis underscores the importance of comprehensive improvement and strategic planning for AnaloS to realize its potential and offer a valuable investment opportunity in the dynamic cryptocurrency landscape.

What is analoS?

Introduction to AnaloS

AnaloS stands out as a memecoin project built on the Solana blockchain. Designed to reflect and capitalize on notable events within the Solana ecosystem, its name is Solana spelled backwards. The launch date of December 24 was strategically chosen to align with the blockchain’s significant growth, quickly drawing community attention.

Tokenomics and Allocation

The ANALOS token, central to the project, has a substantial total supply of 100 billion. The allocation plan is notably strategic: 75% dedicated to liquidity, 20% to marketing, and 5% to airdrops. This distribution reflects a clear focus on maintaining liquidity and promoting widespread adoption through vigorous marketing efforts.

Popularity and Controversies

Shortly after its release, ANALOS became a notable entity in the cryptocurrency space, topping trend lists on Dexscreener for Solana. However, its journey has not been without issues. The project faced accusations of being a scam, leading to the official ban of its Account X for violating platform rules. Issues such as asset theft and the spread of harmful links further tainted its reputation. In a bid to address these concerns, AnaloS has allocated $50,000 for compensating affected users, showcasing a commitment to resolve disputes and rebuild trust.

Investor Considerations

While AnaloS offers a fresh take on leveraging ecosystem events, its path is fraught with the volatility and risks inherent to memecoins. The project’s initial popularity does not shield it from the potential of declining interest over time. Thus, investors are urged to exercise caution and perform comprehensive due diligence. Evaluating both the innovative aspects and the challenges faced by AnaloS is crucial in making informed investment decisions.

Fundamental analysis of the analoS - ANALOS cryptocurrency

analoS - ANALOS performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

PawStars LOGO
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average
TokenFi LOGO
SCORE: 4.30
RATING: Average
memecoin logo
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
wall street memes logo
SCORE: 5.10
RATING: Average
SCORE: 6.19
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.87
RATING: Average
Catgirl - logo
SCORE: 4.71
RATING: Average
PEPE 2.0 - logo
SCORE: 4.17
RATING: Average
Shiba Inu - logo
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
Dogecoin - logo
SCORE: 6.01
RATING: Good
PEPE - Logo
SCORE: 5.16
RATING: Average
fundamental-analysis-of-the-milady-meme-coin-cryptocurrency
SCORE: 3.99
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.04
RATING: Fragile