ArbDoge AI
AIDOGE
$0.00

Sector

Meme

Exchange Debut

2023-04-18

Market Cap

58,950,606

Maxim Supply

210,000,000,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

198,486,889,532,776,992

Circ. Supply(%)

94.52%
ArbDoge AI logo

ArbDoge AI

AIDOGE

Price

$0.00

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

58,950,606
2023-04-18

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

1952083
3.2E-10
2.82E-10

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

-6.0127
-10
-8.3333

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

210,000,000,000,000,000
198,486,889,532,776,992
94.52%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the ArbDoge AI cryptocurrency:

In the realm of the Arbitrum ecosystem, the ArbDoge AI project stands as a unique experiment. Guided by AI organisms with a keen interest in Arbitrum, it propels towards the intersection of AI and Web3. This experiment seeks to create an equitable token distribution and involve the community in the development of robust products. However, the fundamental analysis of the ArbDoge AI cryptocurrency unveils a tale of both potential and challenges, with an overall rating of 3.59 out of 10.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 9.1 out of 10

ArbDoge AI shines brightest in its social media and public relations endeavors. It exhibits a remarkable ability to draw and engage followers on its social media platforms, reaching perfect scores in most subcategories. However, the activities of social media administrators reflect an area for potential improvement.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 6.08 out of 10

Upon examining the audit and security aspect in the fundamental analysis of the ArbDoge AI cryptocurrency, we notice areas of concern. The audit results, transparency of information available to the public, and liquidity on exchanges could all benefit from improvements.

TOKENOMICS: Score 6.75 out of 10

The token economics of ArbDoge AI display a dichotomy. On one hand, its low inflation rate garners a high score. On the contrary, a high degree of centralization within the monetary mass seems to counterbalance this positive aspect.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 1.6 out of 10

Ecosystem development emerges as a key challenge for ArbDoge AI. The project’s ability to meet objectives and plan for new developments have both received the lowest possible scores, indicating a need for greater focus in this area.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 1 out of 10

In the fundamental analysis of the ArbDoge AI cryptocurrency, it becomes evident that the team’s experience and the number of software developers are areas of concern, as they both receive the lowest scores. It is vital to address these deficiencies to enhance project execution and advancement.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 0.4 out of 10

The project’s product utility and the utility of tokens within the ecosystem appear to be significant concerns. Given their low scores, it’s clear that more attention needs to be directed towards improving the functionality and usefulness of the product and its associated tokens.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 1 out of 10

Lastly, the number and capacity of investors and the number and quality of partners also reflect lower scores, suggesting that the project could benefit from fostering stronger relationships and partnerships in the industry.

Fundamental analysis of the ArbDoge AI cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

A comprehensive fundamental analysis of the ArbDoge AI cryptocurrency reveals a project with considerable potential yet also notable shortcomings. The project’s ability to attract and engage a sizable community is commendable, but it is significantly impeded by limitations in audit and security, tokenomics, ecosystem development, and team experience. Despite its potential, the project’s current state suggests a high-risk investment with a substantial need for development and improvement across several key areas. Future investors should be cautious and monitor the evolution of these aspects closely.

ArbDoge AI: An Innovative Player in the Arbitrum Ecosystem

ArbDoge AI, an innovative facet of the Arbitrum ecosystem, represents a unique shift from traditional crypto projects. The fundamental analysis of the ArbDoge AI cryptocurrency reveals that instead of conventional venture capitalist (VC) funding or team shares, it’s a creation wholly by artificial intelligence (AI) and fueled by the community through the AIDOGE deflationary token.

ArbDoge AI Protocol: A VC-free Community-driven Endeavor

ArbDoge AI stands apart from other crypto projects due to its revolutionary distribution model. There are no VC institutions or team shares involved, creating a platform purely for and by the community. This democratic approach saw all AIDOGE tokens fairly distributed among community members from its inception on Apr 15, 2023.

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of ArbDoge AI

What truly sets ArbDoge AI apart is its creators – a significant group of AI ‘organisms’ that display an uncanny enthusiasm for the Arbitrum ecosystem. These AI entities aim to meld web3 technology with AI, designing a product line that advances the reach and potential of both technologies.  ArbDoge AI cryptocurrency suggests that the synergy of AI and web3 may lead to unprecedented developments in the crypto space.

fundamental-analysis-of-the-arbdoge-ai-cryptocurrency

ArbDoge AI - AIDOGE performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

analos logo
SCORE: 4.29
RATING: Average
PawStars LOGO
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average
TokenFi LOGO
SCORE: 4.30
RATING: Average
memecoin logo
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
wall street memes logo
SCORE: 5.10
RATING: Average
SCORE: 6.19
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.87
RATING: Average
Catgirl - logo
SCORE: 4.71
RATING: Average
PEPE 2.0 - logo
SCORE: 4.17
RATING: Average
Shiba Inu - logo
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
Dogecoin - logo
SCORE: 6.01
RATING: Good
PEPE - Logo
SCORE: 5.16
RATING: Average
fundamental-analysis-of-the-milady-meme-coin-cryptocurrency
SCORE: 3.99
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.04
RATING: Fragile