Heroes of Mavia - logo
Heroes of Mavia
MAVIA
$5.55

Sector

Gaming

Exchange Debut

2024-02-06

Market Cap

166,388,631

Maxim Supply

Circulating Supply

30,000,000

Circ. Supply(%)

Heroes of Mavia - logo

Heroes of Mavia

MAVIA

Price

$5.55

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

166,388,631
2024-02-06

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

47396385
6.083439633139
5.429154132028

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

-8.4077
-22.4475

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

30,000,000

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA cryptocurrency:

 

Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA stands out as a compelling mobile free-to-play Web3 MMO Strategy game, crafted with finesse by Skrice Studios. Set on the enchanting island of Mavia, this game invites players into a world where constructing bases, deploying strategic defenses, and engaging in exhilarating battles for resources pave the path to victory. With a final score of 6.65 out of 10 from a fundamental analysis, it demonstrates a promising blend of social engagement, security measures, and utility, albeit with areas needing improvement, especially in team experience and ecosystem development. Fundamental analysis of the Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA cryptocurrency underlines its potential and areas for growth in the dynamic landscape of gaming cryptocurrencies.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 7.90 out of 10

The game shines in social media and community engagement. It scores high in attracting followers and active participation. Yet, it could boost media presence and admin activities. This would enhance its impact further.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 7.78 out of 10

Audit and security aspects of Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA fare well, with commendable audit results and reasonable transparency. The liquidity on exchanges also indicates a stable foundation, although there is always a necessity for ongoing vigilance and enhancements to maintain and boost trust among users.

TOKENOMICS: Score 6.15 out of 10

The token economy of Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA reveals a mix of strengths and weaknesses. The project’s centralized monetary mass scores high, yet its inflationary nature raises concerns, highlighting the need for a more balanced approach to sustain long-term value and appeal.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 5.80 out of 10

The project aims to achieve its goals and plans for new developments. Yet, more efforts are needed to fully unlock its potential and meet community needs.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 3.40 out of 10

The relatively low score in this area reflects concerns about the team’s experience and the limited number of software developers. Strengthening the team with more experienced professionals and increasing the developer count could significantly enhance the project’s prospects.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 7.20 out of 10

The utility of the product and tokens within the ecosystem receives a positive evaluation, indicating a strong foundation for practical use and value creation. However, there is room for further improvement to maximize the product’s utility and attractiveness.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 8.25 out of 10

This criterion stands as a strong suit for Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA, showcasing robust investor support and quality partnerships. Such backing is crucial for sustained growth and innovation, underscoring the project’s solid footing in this aspect.

Fundamental analysis of the Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

The fundamental analysis of the Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA cryptocurrency reveals a project with significant potential, marked by its strong social media presence, solid audit and security framework, and notable support from partners and investors. However, the analysis also highlights critical areas for improvement, such as team experience, ecosystem development, and addressing the inflationary nature of its tokenomics. Investors should weigh these factors, considering both the opportunities and risks inherent in the project. Enhancing the team’s capabilities and refining the ecosystem could elevate the project’s standing and attractiveness to both gamers and investors alike. As the landscape of gaming cryptocurrencies evolves, Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA has the foundation to grow and adapt, potentially leading to a brighter future in the bustling market of blockchain-based games.

What is Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA?

 

Exploring Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA

Heroes of Mavia is a thrilling mobile MMO Strategy game. Set on the fantasy island of Mavia, it’s crafted by Skrice Studios. This game lets players build bases and battle for resources. The goal? To secure Gold, Oil, and Ruby. Players need to be smart. They place defenses like walls and turrets to keep attackers at bay. Also, they attack rivals to snatch their resources.

The Battle for Resources

In the game, managing resources is key. Players use Gold, Oil, and Ruby to grow. They must defend their bases with smart tactics. At the same time, they attack to steal from others. Earning Ruby is vital. It lets players upgrade their NFTs, which boosts their game strategy.

NFTs and Strategy

What makes Heroes of Mavia stand out? Its use of NFTs. This feature blends strategy with digital ownership. Players can upgrade their assets, adding a layer of depth to the game. This not only requires skill but also a good strategy for managing digital assets.

In discussing the fundamental analysis of the Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA cryptocurrency, it’s essential to grasp the game’s basics, resource management, and the role of NFTs. These factors make the game not just fun but also a lesson in digital asset management. For players and investors, this insight is key. It shows how gameplay and asset management can influence the MAVIA token’s value. Thus, Heroes of Mavia is more than a game. It’s a gateway into the world of Web3 gaming, where strategy and digital ownership go hand in hand.

Fundamental analysis of the Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA cryptocurrency

Heroes of Mavia-MAVIA performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

SCORE: 7.24
RATING: Good
Pixels - logo
SCORE: 7.42
RATING: Good
playdapp
SCORE: 5.17
RATING: Average
star-atlas
SCORE: 6.90
RATING: Good
beam logo
SCORE: 5.55
RATING: Average
playdapp
SCORE: 6.30
RATING: Good
metacade logo
SCORE: 6.43
RATING: Good
Big Time logo
SCORE: 4.65
RATING: Average
yield guild games logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
logo games for a living
SCORE: 6.13
RATING: Good
Logo Hello Labs
SCORE: 6.47
RATING: Good
Enjin coin logo
SCORE: 8.40
RATING: Excellent
SCORE: 6.39
RATING: Good
Gala - logo
SCORE: 7.65
RATING: Good
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
TNC Coin -Logo
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average