logo games for a living
Games for a Living
GFAL
$0.04

Sector

Gaming

Exchange Debut

2023-03-14

Market Cap

57,754,507

Maxim Supply

10,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

1,601,851,148

Circ. Supply(%)

16.02%
logo games for a living

Games for a Living

GFAL

Price

$0.04

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

57,754,507
2023-03-14

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

661634
0.036430342673
0.032970749912

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

7.6106
20.5986
3.5449

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

10,000,000,000
1,601,851,148
16.02%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Games for a Living cryptocurrency:

 

The Web3 gaming platform, “Games for a Living”, aspires to bring groundbreaking innovation to the gaming arena with its pioneering blockchain game, Elemental Raiders. Featuring a user-friendly experience through its GFAL ID & Portal, marketplace, and analytics tools, it offers players an unprecedented gaming environment. With a commendable fundamental analysis score of 6.13 out of 10, this project reveals potential, hinting at a promising avenue for crypto enthusiasts and gamers alike.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 5.3 out of 10

Delving into the social and media metrics, Games for a Living exhibits a notable community presence, as evidenced by a full score for community activity. This suggests an enthusiastic and engaged user base, a crucial component for the longevity of any project. Nevertheless, areas such as media presence and the activities of social media administrators need fortification. Boosting these elements can further solidify the project’s standing in public perception.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 7.35 out of 10

Turning our attention to audit and security, the fundamental analysis of the Games for a Living cryptocurrency project indicates robust transparency, with public information readily accessible. However, there remains room for improvement in terms of liquidity on exchanges. Ensuring liquidity can provide better price stability and trust among investors.

TOKENOMICS: Score 4.73 out of 10

When analyzing the token economy, the inflationary nature of the project seems to be a concerning factor, hinting at the potential for value dilution. On the flip side, the distribution of the monetary mass isn’t overly centralized, which can potentially provide more decentralized control and reduce manipulation risks.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 5.8 out of 10

The project seems to be on track with its developmental goals. There’s a clear intent for future advancements, crucial for keeping up with the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 8.36 out of 10

The backbone of any successful project lies in its team. Games for a Living boasts an experienced team, particularly highlighted by a solid score in this area. A more extensive developer base, however, could fast-track innovations and address potential technical challenges more efficiently.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 7 out of 10

From the utility perspective, both the product and the tokens within the Games for a Living ecosystem serve valuable functions. This symbiotic relationship between product and token utility is pivotal for sustained user engagement.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 5 out of 10

Lastly, while the investor capacity seems promising, forming high-quality partnerships could exponentially amplify the project’s reach and credibility.

Fundamental analysis of the Games for a Living cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

Drawing from the fundamental analysis of the Games for a Living cryptocurrency, it is clear that while there are commendable strengths, particularly in the realm of team expertise and product utility, certain areas require bolstering. Potential investors should weigh the project’s evident enthusiasm and community engagement against the potential risks stemming from its inflationary nature and areas needing enhancement. As always, diversification and thorough research remain paramount when considering investment opportunities in the dynamic world of cryptocurrencies.

What is Games for a Living?

 

Games for a Living is a pioneering Web3 gaming platform. With its first release, Elemental Raiders, it’s setting new standards for sustainable blockchain gaming. The subsequent games, like Diamond Dreams, further establish its dominance in the market.

GFAL: The Heart of the Platform

GFAL is the core currency for Games for a Living. This utility token bridges all operations within their ecosystem. In-game assets, exclusive purchases, and trades are all fueled by $GFAL. The token also supports a VIP system. This rewards $GFAL’s active users with discounts, special access, and governance rights. Developers, too, gain perks like game analytics and event access by holding $GFAL. As the platform grows, so does the utility of the $GFAL token.

The Pillars Behind Games for a Living

Founded in 2021, Games for a Living boasts a robust management team. Led by CEO Manel Sort, ex-FVP of King Barcelona Studio, the team includes industry veterans like Trip Hawkins and Javier León. The collective experience surpasses 140 years, ensuring a strong foundation for this innovative venture.

What Sets Games for a Living Apart?

The unique edge of Games for a Living lies in its approach to Web3 gaming. By prioritizing quality, accessibility, and reach, they aim to redefine the gaming experience. Their games incorporate web3 features, ensuring easy access and usability. Additionally, the platform taps into the power of blockchain. This ensures proof of ownership and easy asset trading. Their vision is clear: enhancing traditional gaming without imposing web3 mechanics.

Fundamental Analysis of the Games for a Living Cryptocurrency

The cryptocurrency’s strength is its integration with the gaming platform. As more games are launched, the demand and utility of $GFAL are set to rise. This symbiotic relationship promises growth and stability for the cryptocurrency.

In conclusion, Games for a Living represents the future of gaming. With its strong foundation and innovative approach, it’s a game-changer in the world of Web3 gaming platforms.

Fundamental analysis of the Games for a Living cryptocurrency

Games for a Living - GFAL performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

SCORE: 7.24
RATING: Good
Pixels - logo
SCORE: 7.42
RATING: Good
Heroes of Mavia - logo
SCORE: 6.65
RATING: Good
playdapp
SCORE: 5.17
RATING: Average
star-atlas
SCORE: 6.90
RATING: Good
beam logo
SCORE: 5.55
RATING: Average
playdapp
SCORE: 6.30
RATING: Good
metacade logo
SCORE: 6.43
RATING: Good
Big Time logo
SCORE: 4.65
RATING: Average
yield guild games logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
Logo Hello Labs
SCORE: 6.47
RATING: Good
Enjin coin logo
SCORE: 8.40
RATING: Excellent
SCORE: 6.39
RATING: Good
Gala - logo
SCORE: 7.65
RATING: Good
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
TNC Coin -Logo
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average