Dejitaru Tsuka
TSUKA
$0.02

Sector

Meme

Exchange Debut

2022-07-18

Market Cap

24,223,400

Maxim Supply

1,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

1,000,000,000

Circ. Supply(%)

100.00%
Dejitaru Tsuka

Dejitaru Tsuka

TSUKA

Price

$0.02

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

24,223,400
2022-07-18

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

515717
0.025927784338
0.023693355046

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

2.0143
-5.1421
8.8366

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

1,000,000,000
1,000,000,000
100.00%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Dejitaru Tsuka cryptocurrency:

The Dejitaru Tsuka cryptocurrency project, steeped in Japanese lore and symbolizing prosperity and abundance, stands as a testament to the intricate world of blockchain technology. The fundamental analysis of the Dejitaru Tsuka cryptocurrency project revealed a mixed landscape of success and struggle, landing it an overall score of 3.04 out of 10.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 6 out of 10

The Dejitaru Tsuka project has shown impressive prowess in social media, with an ability to draw followers and elicit high community activity. However, it falls short in maintaining active social media administrators and establishing a solid presence in media outlets. Its moderate size community on chat groups further confirms this divide, suggesting the need for improved media and communication strategy.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 0.68 out of 10

The fundamental analysis of the Dejitaru Tsuka cryptocurrency shows critical deficiencies in the realm of audit and security. Failing audit results, lack of transparency in public information, and a mediocre liquidity status on exchanges all contribute to a dismal score in this category. These issues warrant immediate attention for the project to build investor trust and ensure sustainable growth.

TOKENOMICS: Score 9.8 out of 10

Dejitaru Tsuka fares exceptionally well in the token economy aspect. The project operates under an inflationary model with complete decentralization of its monetary mass, thereby offering a strong case for its potential financial sustainability and investor appeal.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 1 out of 10

The project’s ecosystem development is currently weak, with little evidence of achieved objectives or future development plans. The low score in this area reflects the fundamental analysis of the Dejitaru Tsuka cryptocurrency and suggests that significant improvements must be made to enhance its long-term viability.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 1 out of 10

Dejitaru Tsuka’s team, unfortunately, lacks adequate experience and has a limited number of software developers. This shortage could severely impact the project’s growth trajectory and needs to be addressed to ensure successful execution of the project’s roadmap.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 1 out of 10

The product utility score is low, indicating that the practical application of the Dejitaru Tsuka tokens within its ecosystem is not well-defined or lacks value proposition. An improved utility design could boost user engagement and thus, the project’s success.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 1 out of 10

The number and capacity of investors, as well as the quality and quantity of partners, are notably lacking. These factors significantly influence the project’s credibility, stability, and potential for growth.

Fundamental analysis of the Dejitaru Tsuka cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

The fundamental analysis of the Dejitaru Tsuka cryptocurrency reveals significant potential in tokenomics but equally significant shortcomings in areas such as security, ecosystem development, and team experience. There is an urgent need to address these issues for the project to realize its potential fully. The project also needs to enhance its media presence and communication strategies to expand its user base. Investors should approach with caution due to the high-risk nature of the project at this stage.

Understanding Dejitaru Tsuka

Dejitaru Tsuka is a distinctive token that operates on the Ethereum blockchain, distinguishing it from the traditional concept of a cryptocurrency coin. Its representation as a token, rather than a coin, is essential when considering aspects like price predictions.

Dejitaru Tsuka: The Dragon Metaphor

Interestingly, the token’s description is cloaked in metaphorical language, referencing Japanese folklore. It portrays the Dejitaru Tsuka dragon as a herald of prosperity and wisdom, attributing to it an aura of fear and reverence. This dragon is alleged to bestow abundant wealth on those who embrace its might.

The Missing Whitepaper: An Investment Concern

A conspicuous omission, however, is the lack of a whitepaper. Typically, a whitepaper is a fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency, crucial for potential investors to comprehend the essence of the token and to perform a risk assessment. Unfortunately, Dejitaru Tsuka’s whitepaper has not been made public, and the team behind it has not responded to requests for its disclosure. This is problematic because, without the whitepaper, investors cannot make an informed decision about investing in this token.

An Ethereum-Based Token Shrouded in Mystery

In conclusion, Dejitaru Tsuka is an Ethereum-based token that weaves the symbolism of a powerful dragon from Japanese lore into its identity. Despite its grand depiction, the missing whitepaper raises concerns, creating a veil of uncertainty around the token. This hinders potential investors from making informed decisions, as the fundamental analysis of the Dejitaru Tsuka cryptocurrency remains largely undisclosed.

Dejitaru Tsuka - TSUKA performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

PawStars LOGO
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average
TokenFi LOGO
SCORE: 4.30
RATING: Average
memecoin logo
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
wall street memes logo
SCORE: 5.10
RATING: Average
SCORE: 6.19
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.87
RATING: Average
Catgirl - logo
SCORE: 4.71
RATING: Average
PEPE 2.0 - logo
SCORE: 4.17
RATING: Average
Shiba Inu - logo
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
Dogecoin - logo
SCORE: 6.01
RATING: Good
PEPE - Logo
SCORE: 5.16
RATING: Average
fundamental-analysis-of-the-milady-meme-coin-cryptocurrency
SCORE: 3.99
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile