PEPE 2.0 - logo
Pepe 2.0
PEPE2.0
$0.00

Sector

Meme

Exchange Debut

2023-06-28

Market Cap

0

Maxim Supply

420,690,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

Circ. Supply(%)

PEPE 2.0 - logo

Pepe 2.0

PEPE2.0

Price

$0.00

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

0
2023-06-28

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

24764184
1.01091E-7
7.0102E-8

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

7.5931
-28.6073
437.1893

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

420,690,000,000,000

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency:

 

Fundamental analysis of the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency reveals a mixed picture, with a final score of 4.17 out of 10. While the project excels in areas like social media presence and token economy, it falls short in others such as audit and security, ecosystem development, and team experience.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 8.15 out of 10

Despite the overall low score, the Pepe 2.0 project has impressive strength in social and mass media outreach. With high scores in attracting followers, community activity, and media presence, the project demonstrates a robust and engaging community. However, the lower scores in activities of social media administrators and size of communities on chat groups indicate room for improvement.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 4.23 out of 10

The fundamental analysis of the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency highlights potential concerns in the audit and security category. The relatively low scores for audit results and transparency of information may raise red flags for potential investors, despite a reasonable liquidity score. Improved transparency and better audit results could help improve the project’s appeal and stability.

TOKENOMICS: Score 8.75 out of 10

On the brighter side, the project’s token economy has been well received, earning a high score. The project is not inflationary, which is a big plus, and the centralization of the monetary mass is at an acceptable level.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 2.4 out of 10

The ecosystem development of Pepe 2.0 scored rather low. With the lack of achievement of objectives and plans to bring new developments to the project, this can be seen as a significant weakness.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 1.2 out of 10

The score also reflects concerns regarding the team’s experience and the number of software developers involved. The team will need to showcase their capabilities and expand their developer base to increase investor confidence.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 2.2 out of 10

Pepe 2.0’s product and utility scores are another area of concern, reflecting perceived limitations in the current utility of the product and tokens in the ecosystem. It suggests the need for the project to develop and communicate a more compelling use case for its tokens.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 1.75 out of 10

Last but not least, the project scored low on the number and capacity of investors, as well as the number and quality of partners. These aspects are crucial for the project’s long-term success and sustainability.

Fundamental analysis of the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

In conclusion, while the fundamental analysis of the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency indicates a strong online presence and token economy, it also reveals potential areas of concern, especially around audit and security, ecosystem development, and the team’s experience. The project’s scores suggest that Pepe 2.0 needs to address these areas to enhance investor confidence and unlock its full potential. It is recommended that potential investors carefully consider these risks and the project’s strengths before making an investment decision.

What is Pepe 2.0?

Introduction to PEPE 2.0

The renewed version of a digital asset that quickly became known is on the horizon: Pepe 2.0. The lessons learned from previous iterations are the basis of this reimagined entity. The launch of the digital asset is synchronized to balance convenience with attention, presenting an opportunity for potential investors in a period of rest and relaxation.

A team that supports Pepe 2.0

Their vision for this project transcends its initial existence as a meme asset, with projections of a remarkable development in the foreseeable future. Key players bring experience and funds to the table, which could increase the substantial potential that Pepe 2.0 holds.

More than a meme: The Pepe 2.0 proposal

The Pepe 2.0 transformation goes beyond branding, encompassing beneficial utilities and a good expansion strategy. Despite coming from the meme asset world, the team has positioned Pepe 2.0 as a serious competitor in the world of digital finance. They have bold plans to grow and develop the project.

Fundamental analysis of the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency

The fundamental analysis of the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency reveals an interesting proposal for investors. It reveals the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency beyond its meme origins, establishing it as a sought-after asset by the community.

Fundamental analysis of the Pepe 2.0 cryptocurrency

Pepe 2.0 - PEPE 2.0 performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

analos logo
SCORE: 4.29
RATING: Average
PawStars LOGO
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average
TokenFi LOGO
SCORE: 4.30
RATING: Average
memecoin logo
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
wall street memes logo
SCORE: 5.10
RATING: Average
SCORE: 6.19
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.87
RATING: Average
Catgirl - logo
SCORE: 4.71
RATING: Average
Shiba Inu - logo
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
Dogecoin - logo
SCORE: 6.01
RATING: Good
PEPE - Logo
SCORE: 5.16
RATING: Average
fundamental-analysis-of-the-milady-meme-coin-cryptocurrency
SCORE: 3.99
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.04
RATING: Fragile