fundamental-analysis-of-the-milady-meme-coin-cryptocurrency
Milady Meme Coin
LADYS
$0.00

Sector

Meme

Exchange Debut

2023-05-09

Market Cap

98,972,139

Maxim Supply

888,000,888,000,888

Circulating Supply

888,000,888,000,888

Circ. Supply(%)

100.00%
fundamental-analysis-of-the-milady-meme-coin-cryptocurrency

Milady Meme Coin

LADYS

Price

$0.00

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

98,972,139
2023-05-09

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

8863976
1.13788E-7
8.5858E-8

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

16.0724
67.7074
104.3621

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

888,000,888,000,888
888,000,888,000,888
100.00%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency:

Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency reveals its strengths and weaknesses in various areas. Milady Meme Coin (LADYS) is a project created by passionate supporters of the Milady Maker NFT collection. This neochibi-aesthetic-inspired NFT collection features 10,000 profile pictures with unique drip scores, designed by Milady Sonora and Charlotte Fang. LADYS positions itself as the „drip currency” of Milady, paying homage to the NFT collection. However, it’s important to assess the project’s overall potential through a comprehensive fundamental analysis of the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency.

Social & Mass Media: Score 8.73 out of 10

The fundamental analysis of the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency highlights a strong performance in the social and mass media category, with a score of 9.2 out of 10. The project excels in attracting followers on various social media platforms and demonstrates active community engagement. The presence in the media is significant, creating widespread awareness. Additionally, the sizable communities on chat groups indicate a vibrant and passionate user base. These positive social and mass media aspects contribute to the overall appeal of the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency.

Audit & Security: Score 1.67 out of 10

When considering the audit and security aspect, the fundamental analysis raises concerns, with a score of 1.2 out of 10. The lack of comprehensive audit results is a notable weakness, potentially impacting the project’s overall security and transparency. Transparency of information available to the public is also subpar. However, there is some liquidity on exchanges, which offers a partial level of confidence. Addressing these weaknesses and prioritizing enhanced security measures would be crucial for establishing trust among investors in the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency.

Tokenomics: Score 8.35 out of 10

The fundamental analysis reveals a strong score of 8.35 out of 10 in the tokenomics category for the Milady Meme Coin. The project demonstrates a solid token economy with a low inflation rate, ensuring stability and long-term value. The monetary mass is relatively decentralized, which further enhances its attractiveness. These favorable tokenomics aspects position the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency as a potential investment opportunity, providing a foundation for sustainable growth and value appreciation.

Ecosystem Development: Score 1.4 out of 10

In terms of ecosystem development, the fundamental analysis indicates a score of 1.4 out of 10, reflecting significant weaknesses. The project has not achieved its objectives satisfactorily, and there is a lack of concrete plans for bringing new developments. This hinders the project’s overall growth potential and sustainability. To enhance the investment opportunity and future prospects, the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency needs to focus on goal attainment and actively pursue innovative advancements within its ecosystem.

Team & Developers: Score 1 out of 10

The fundamental analysis raises concerns regarding the team and developers, as indicated by a score of 1 out of 10. The project lacks an experienced team and has a limited number of software developers involved. Building a competent and skilled team is essential for the successful execution and progression of any cryptocurrency project. The current team limitations pose risks to the development and implementation of the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency.

Product & Utility: Score 3.8 out of 10

Considering the product and utility, the fundamental analysis assigns a score of 3.8 out of 10 to the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency. While the Milady Maker NFT collection has gained attention and popularity, the utility of the token within the ecosystem is relatively limited.

Partners & Investors: Score 1 out of 10

In terms of partners and investors, the fundamental analysis indicates a score of 1 out of 10 for the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency. The project currently lacks significant partnerships and struggles to attract a substantial number of investors. Establishing strategic partnerships and securing investments from reputable entities can bring valuable resources, expertise, and credibility to the project. Strengthening these areas can enhance the investment potential and open doors to new opportunities.

Fundamental analysis of the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

After conducting a comprehensive fundamental analysis of the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency, it becomes apparent that the project carries both risks and investment potential. The project exhibits strengths in social and mass media presence, tokenomics, and overall concept appeal. However, weaknesses in areas such as audit and security, ecosystem development, team expertise, and utility of the token should not be overlooked.

Investors interested in the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency should carefully evaluate the risks associated with the project. Mitigating concerns regarding audit and security measures, strengthening the development team, and establishing partnerships are critical steps to enhance the project’s overall credibility and potential for success. Additionally, expanding the utility of the token and actively pursuing ecosystem development goals can increase its value proposition and attract further interest from investors.

It is important for potential investors to conduct thorough due diligence, monitor the project’s progress, and assess any updates or improvements implemented by the team. The risks involved in investing in the Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency should be carefully weighed against the potential rewards. Only by understanding and considering the fundamental analysis of the project can investors make informed decisions about its investment suitability for their portfolios.

Introduction to the Milady NFT Collection and Controversies

The Milady Maker NFT collection, inspired by neochibi aesthetics, comprises 10,000 profile pictures (PFPs) created by pseudonymous Twitter users, Milady Sonora and Charlotte Fang. Rated by a unique ‘drip score’, these avatars feature Japanese street-style tribe-inspired outfits. Despite the initial hype leading to an impressive selling price of $6,000 per NFT in April 2022, the collection faced turmoil when Charlotte Fang was accused of being a pseudonymous neo-Nazi bigot.

Milady Community’s Diverse Features and Milady Meme Coin (LADYS)

Besides the PFPs, Milady Maker offers its community additional features such as Milady VRtube, Milady rave parties in global cities, merchandise, and a metaverse. Following the controversy, supporters created the unaffiliated Milady Meme Coin (LADYS), positioning it as the collection’s ‘drip currency’.

Potential Links to Milady Meme Coin Cryptocurrency: A Fundamental Analysis

Although it was not specifically mentioned, the circumstances surrounding the Milady NFTs and LADYS may have potential implications for Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency. For a fundamental analysis of Milady Meme Coin cryptocurrency, it would be interesting to study the impact of such controversy-laden NFTs and meme coins on the overall perception and performance of cryptocurrencies.

fundamental-analysis-of-the-milady-meme-coin-cryptocurrency

Milady Meme Coin - LADYS performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

analos logo
SCORE: 4.29
RATING: Average
PawStars LOGO
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average
TokenFi LOGO
SCORE: 4.30
RATING: Average
memecoin logo
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
wall street memes logo
SCORE: 5.10
RATING: Average
SCORE: 6.19
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.87
RATING: Average
Catgirl - logo
SCORE: 4.71
RATING: Average
PEPE 2.0 - logo
SCORE: 4.17
RATING: Average
Shiba Inu - logo
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
Dogecoin - logo
SCORE: 6.01
RATING: Good
PEPE - Logo
SCORE: 5.16
RATING: Average
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.04
RATING: Fragile