Clash of Lilliput
COL
$0.74

Sector

Gaming

Exchange Debut

2022-06-18

Market Cap

60,640,564

Maxim Supply

1,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

82,074,400

Circ. Supply(%)

8.21%
Clash of Lilliput

Clash of Lilliput

COL

Price

$0.74

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

60,640,564
2022-06-18

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

53311
0.757216654096
0.72711245871

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

-2.4228
21.0616
42.9469

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

1,000,000,000
82,074,400
8.21%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Clash of Lilliput cryptocurrency:

With an overall score of 2.44 out of 10, the „Clash of Lilliput” cryptocurrency is an intriguing blockchain initiative centered on a strategy game that simulates the survival and prosperity of a race of miniature people. In this game, players can enhance their tribe by recruiting workers, collecting resources, upgrading buildings, researching technology, and engaging in both PvE and PvP battles. It’s evident from the „Fundamental analysis of the Clash of Lilliput cryptocurrency” that the project has its strengths and weaknesses.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 3.1 out of 10

Despite demonstrating some potential with a reasonable community size on chat groups and activities of social media administrators, the „Clash of Lilliput” project falls short in terms of its social media and mass media presence. Attracting followers and encouraging community activity on social media platforms has proven challenging. Its media presence is low, which may affect the overall reach and popularity of the project. This calls for a strategic improvement in social media engagement and public relations to boost the project’s visibility.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 3.75 out of 10

In terms of audit and security, the „Fundamental analysis of the Clash of Lilliput cryptocurrency” reveals a few areas of concern. Although the audit results show some level of compliance, transparency of information available to the public and liquidity on exchange are remarkably low. These results suggest that there’s a necessity for the project to enhance its security measures and liquidity to bolster investor confidence.

TOKENOMICS: Score 1.55 out of 10

The token economy of „Clash of Lilliput” poses another challenge. The project shows a high level of centralization and potential inflation, which might detract potential investors. To enhance its tokenomics, the project may consider implementing strategies to control inflation and decentralize the monetary mass.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 3 out of 10

The development of the ecosystem is moderately progressing. The project appears to have achieved some objectives and shows a willingness to bring new developments to the project. Nonetheless, there is room for growth, and it’s imperative to focus on meeting more objectives and implementing innovative developments to increase the overall score in the „Fundamental analysis of the Clash of Lilliput cryptocurrency.”

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 1 out of 10

The team behind the project is a crucial aspect, but in this case, it seems to be one of the weakest links. With low scores for both the experience of the team and the number of software developers, it is apparent that improvements and expansion of the team might be necessary for the project to thrive.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 2.6 out of 10

The utility of the product and its tokens in the ecosystem have scored relatively low. This indicates a need for enhancing the overall usability and intrinsic value of the tokens within the gaming ecosystem. By doing so, it would heighten the project’s value proposition, providing further incentive for users to participate.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 1.5 out of 10

Finally, the project lacks a robust network of partners and investors, which is crucial for its growth and success. Strengthening partnerships and attracting investment should be a focus, as these elements could significantly bolster the project’s financial stability and market reputation.

Fundamental analysis of the Clash of Lilliput cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

The „Fundamental analysis of the Clash of Lilliput cryptocurrency” paints a picture of a project with potential but significant room for improvement. Given the current low scores across a number of essential criteria, it appears that there is substantial risk associated with investment in this project at this stage. The team’s experience, tokenomics, social media presence, and security and audit practices all warrant serious enhancements to mitigate the risk and make it a more appealing investment opportunity.

However, the potential of the underlying gaming concept should not be overlooked. The premise of the game – survival, prosperity, and strategic competition – could hold significant appeal for a large audience if executed well. In the growing sector of play-to-earn games, Clash of Lilliput could yet carve a profitable niche for itself.

Considering the current state of the project and the scores it received from the „Fundamental analysis of the Clash of Lilliput cryptocurrency”, it’s clear that a potential investor would need to be willing to assume a high degree of risk. However, with substantial improvements in the identified areas, the project could present an exciting investment opportunity in the future.

In conclusion, Clash of Lilliput is a project in its infancy with potential for growth if significant improvements are made in several key areas. The strategic incorporation of these enhancements, alongside the exciting premise of the game, could make the fundamental analysis of this cryptocurrency project more appealing for future investors. As always, potential investors should conduct their own thorough research before deciding to invest.

Game Introduction

Clash of Lilliput introduces an exciting Strategic Simulation Game (SLG) setting, where miniature people embark on an adventure to build and expand their tribe for survival and prosperity in an unpredictable world. Players’ responsibilities include cultivating their tribe, recruiting workers, managing resources, upgrading buildings, and advancing their technology across the Lilliput Kingdom.

Army Development and PvP Competition

Furthermore, the game allows players to train warriors and raise unique pets to strengthen their armies. Players can participate in Player vs. Environment (PVE) challenges like the Secret Challenge, or Player vs. Player (PVP) matches to attack and plunder resources from other players. These resources aid in enhancing their own cities and advancing their technological capabilities for a more formidable army.

Ranked Matches and Reward System

Clash of Lilliput features a ranking system based on seasonal points, earned through victories in PVP ranked matches. These competitive matches involve the attackers and defenders on a sealed battlefield, where the goal for the attackers is to destroy the core building of the defender within a specified time. Token rewards, integral to the Clash of Lilliput Cryptocurrency, are awarded based on the ranking at the end of each season.

Introduction to NFT-Pets and Marketplace

One of the unique features of Clash of Lilliput is its NFT-Pets, which players can trade freely in the marketplace for tokens. Players can acquire pets by buying NFTs in the marketplace or by completing in-game challenges and events. The fusion of pets of the same type and star level can also result in a pet of a higher star level, thus improving the player’s combat capabilities.

Resource Gathering and Plundering

Various categories of resources exist in Clash of Lilliput. Players can either collect these resources by assigning workers or can opt for a more aggressive strategy by plundering from other cities. The game is set to gradually open trading for these resources in exchange for COL, making resource management a crucial aspect of gameplay.

În concluzie, Clash of Lilliput oferă un amestec complex de strategie, competiție PVP, tranzacționare NFT și management al resurselor, toate susținute de propria sa criptomonedă. Această combinație interesantă promite un joc pe cât de captivant, pe atât de plin de satisfacții.

Fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Clash of Lilliput

Clash of Lilliput - COL performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

SCORE: 7.24
RATING: Good
Pixels - logo
SCORE: 7.42
RATING: Good
Heroes of Mavia - logo
SCORE: 6.65
RATING: Good
playdapp
SCORE: 5.17
RATING: Average
star-atlas
SCORE: 6.90
RATING: Good
beam logo
SCORE: 5.55
RATING: Average
playdapp
SCORE: 6.30
RATING: Good
metacade logo
SCORE: 6.43
RATING: Good
Big Time logo
SCORE: 4.65
RATING: Average
yield guild games logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
logo games for a living
SCORE: 6.13
RATING: Good
Logo Hello Labs
SCORE: 6.47
RATING: Good
Enjin coin logo
SCORE: 8.40
RATING: Excellent
SCORE: 6.39
RATING: Good
Gala - logo
SCORE: 7.65
RATING: Good
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good