Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 0.00% | Volume (24h): $42,707,933,837 | Market Cap: $2,606,667,657,730
Projects listed: 276 |
Sector
Exchange Debut
Market Cap
Maxim Supply
Circulating Supply
Circ. Supply(%)
Price
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
The Frax Protocol represents a pioneering approach in the cryptocurrency world, being the first fractional-algorithmic stablecoin system. Its unique structure combines collateral backing with algorithmic adjustments, providing a scalable and decentralized monetary solution on the Ethereum blockchain. The fundamental analysis of the Frax – FRAX cryptocurrency reveals a total score of 6.73 out of 10. This score reflects various aspects of the project, including social presence, security, token economy, and more. The protocol’s aim to replace fixed-supply digital assets with a more dynamic, decentralized currency sets a notable precedent in the crypto landscape.
The Frax Protocol demonstrates a strong presence in social and mass media, evidenced by its overall score of 7.3. Its community is highly active on social media platforms, achieving perfect scores in community activity and media presence. However, there are areas for improvement, particularly in attracting followers and enhancing the activities of social media administrators.
In terms of audit and security, the Frax Protocol earns a solid 7.5. It shows commendable transparency and has undergone thorough audits, ensuring a reliable and secure framework for users. Liquidity on exchanges also stands out as a strong point, enhancing the protocol’s trustworthiness.
The token economy of Frax scores a notable 7.75. The project excels in managing inflation, maintaining a balanced approach. However, the centralization of the monetary mass is a concern, indicating a need for more distributed control and ownership.
Frax’s ecosystem development is progressing well, with a score of 7.24. The project has been successful in achieving its objectives and shows promise in bringing new developments. Continued focus on innovation and expansion will be crucial for its future growth.
The team behind Frax, scoring 6.8, possesses significant experience, though there is room for growth in the number of software developers. Expanding the development team could accelerate innovation and implementation of new features.
The utility of the Frax product and its tokens within the ecosystem scores 4.5. While there is some utility recognized, there’s a notable need for enhancement in this area to increase the relevance and applicability of the tokens.
The partnership and investor network of Frax scores 6.9. The protocol has attracted a decent number of investors and partners, though there’s potential for further expansion and collaboration to strengthen its market position.
In the final analysis, the Frax Protocol emerges as a novel and promising project in the cryptocurrency domain. Its fractional-algorithmic stablecoin system presents an innovative approach to decentralized finance. While the fundamental analysis of the Frax – FRAX cryptocurrency shows strengths in social media presence, security, and tokenomics, there are areas needing attention, such as product utility and team expansion. The overall score of 6.73 reflects a balanced mix of opportunities and challenges. For investors, this translates to a project with potential, albeit with considerations for the identified areas of improvement. The innovative nature of the protocol, combined with proactive steps to address its weaker areas, could enhance its appeal as a sound investment choice in the evolving crypto landscape.
The Frax Protocol represents a pioneering approach in the realm of stablecoins, introducing the first fractional-algorithmic stablecoin system. This protocol operates entirely on the Ethereum blockchain, with potential for future cross-chain implementations. Its primary objective is to establish a scalable, decentralized, algorithmic currency, an alternative to fixed-supply digital assets like Bitcoin.
A distinctive feature of Frax is its hybrid composition. The supply of its stablecoin, FRAX, is partly backed by collateral and partly algorithmic. The balance between these two is dynamically adjusted based on FRAX’s market price. When FRAX trades above $1, the collateral ratio is reduced. Conversely, a trade value below $1 leads to an increased collateral ratio.
Frax emphasizes community governance and minimal active management. It adopts a highly autonomous, algorithmic governance model, setting it apart from traditional active management systems.
Frax utilizes fully on-chain oracles, specifically Uniswap and Chainlink, for accurate pricing data. The ecosystem comprises two tokens: FRAX, the stablecoin, and Frax Shares (FXS), the governance token. FXS holders benefit from accrued fees, seigniorage revenue, and excess collateral value.
Before Frax, stablecoins were broadly categorized into three types: fiat-collateralized, overcollateralized by cryptocurrency, and purely algorithmic without collateral. Frax introduced a fourth category, the fractional-algorithmic model, marking a significant evolution in the stablecoin space.
The circulation details of FRAX and FXS are significant, with over 60% of FXS supply distributed to liquidity providers and yield farmers over several years. This approach underscores the protocol’s commitment to decentralization and community-driven governance. Frax’s launch in November 2020 was a milestone, as it was the first to blend fractional and algorithmic elements in a stablecoin.
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Name | Domain | Purpose | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
_ga | coin-score.ai | Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. | 2 years | HTTP |
Name | Domain | Purpose | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
_ga_QJD5B840TY | coin-score.ai | --- | 2 years | --- |