Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 51.92% | Volume (24h): $33,650,043,147 | Market Cap: $2,233,957,737,288
Projects listed: 276 |
Sector
Exchange Debut
Market Cap
Maxim Supply
Circulating Supply
Circ. Supply(%)
Price
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
Kusama (KSM), often referred to as “Polkadot’s wild cousin,” emerges as a significant player in the blockchain arena, offering a scalable and interoperable platform for developers. With its foundation in the Substrate framework and close parallels to Polkadot, Kusama distinguishes itself as a canary network, ideal for cutting-edge projects requiring advanced features not yet available on Polkadot. Its role as a testbed and launchpad for blockchain innovation, along with its potential as a standalone solution for projects, renders it a unique entity in the crypto world. The fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency reveals a mixed picture, with an overall score of 6.01 out of 10, reflecting both its strengths and areas for improvement.
Kusama’s performance in social and mass media is noteworthy yet uneven. It excels in attracting followers and maintaining a strong presence in the media, scoring a perfect 10 in both criteria. However, it lags in the activities of social media administrators and size of communities on chat groups, indicating potential areas for enhanced engagement and community building. The fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency underscores the importance of a balanced and proactive social media strategy to bolster its overall appeal and community support.
In the realm of audit and security, Kusama presents a mixed picture. While it shows promise with a decent liquidity score on exchanges, concerns are evident in the results of audits and transparency of public information. This aspect of the fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency suggests a critical need for heightened focus on security and transparency to foster trust and reliability among users and investors.
The token economy of Kusama is a strong suit, reflected in its high score. The project’s approach to inflation and decentralization of its monetary mass is commendable, showing a well-thought-out economic framework. This aspect of the fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency points to a robust and well-structured token economy, which is crucial for long-term sustainability and investor confidence.
Ecosystem development appears to be a significant challenge for Kusama. With low scores in achieving objectives and plans for new developments, it indicates a need for more focused and effective strategies in this area. The fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency highlights the importance of continuous development and innovation to stay relevant and competitive.
The team behind Kusama has a moderate level of experience, but the number of software developers is a concern. This suggests a need for expanding the development team to enhance the platform’s capabilities and innovation potential. The fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency suggests investing in human resources as a key strategy for future growth.
Kusama scores well in terms of the utility of its product and tokens within its ecosystem. This reflects a clear understanding of the market needs and a user-centric approach in product development. The fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency indicates that maintaining and enhancing product utility is crucial for its success.
The project scores impressively in terms of partners and investors, showing strong backing and collaboration. This is indicative of the project’s potential and credibility in the market. The fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency underlines the significance of strong partnerships and investor confidence in driving the project forward.
The fundamental analysis of the Kusama-KSM cryptocurrency presents a nuanced view of its prospects. While the project shines in certain areas like tokenomics and partnerships, it faces challenges in ecosystem development and audit security. The mixed scores reflect a project with substantial potential but also areas that require urgent attention and improvement. From an investment standpoint, Kusama offers intriguing possibilities, especially for those interested in cutting-edge blockchain technology and interoperability. However, investors should be cognizant of the risks, particularly in aspects like security and ecosystem development. Overall, Kusama-KSM stands as a project with significant promise, provided it addresses its weaker areas and continues to build on its strengths.
Kusama, often described as “Polkadot’s wild cousin,” is an experimental blockchain platform. It offers a scalable and interoperable framework, primarily targeting developers. Built on Substrate by Parity Technologies, it shares much of its codebase with Polkadot, a leading interoperable blockchain.
Dr. Gavin Wood, co-founder of Ethereum, led the development of Kusama through Parity Technologies. The platform stands out for its focus on fast-paced, ambitious projects. Its multichain, heterogeneously-sharded design, and a nominated proof-of-stake (NPoS) consensus system enable rapid on-chain upgrades and cross-chain communication. Notably, Kusama’s on-chain governance is highly decentralized, allowing token holders to vote on governance proposals.
Kusama’s distinct approach to blockchain technology is evident in its low barrier to entry for deploying parachains and its minimal requirements for validators. This accessibility makes it particularly appealing to early-stage startups and experimental projects. It is supported by the Web3 Foundation, which contributes to research and community development.
The security of the Kusama network is anchored in its NPoS consensus mechanism. This involves a network of nominators and validators, with a slashing system to penalize dishonest or underperforming validators. Additionally, Kusama utilizes a queuing mechanism based on Merkle trees for secure, trustless cross-chain transactions.
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Name | Domain | Purpose | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
_ga | coin-score.ai | Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. | 2 years | HTTP |
Name | Domain | Purpose | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
_ga_QJD5B840TY | coin-score.ai | --- | 2 years | --- |