undamental analysis of the Marblex cryptocurrency
MARBLEX
MBX
$0.51

Sector

Gaming

Exchange Debut

2022-05-09

Market Cap

66,201,323

Maxim Supply

1,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

130,774,059

Circ. Supply(%)

13.08%
undamental analysis of the Marblex cryptocurrency

MARBLEX

MBX

Price

$0.51

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

66,201,323
2022-05-09

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

1114221
0.507262321716
0.494061071737

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

2.4062
-1.7167
-29.4322

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

1,000,000,000
130,774,059
13.08%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Marblex cryptocurrency:

MARBLEX ($MBX) is a Klaytn Compatible Token (KCT) on the Klaytn blockchain. Its strength lies in its high transaction processing, reliability, and transparency. MARBLEX aims to offer an ecosystem where users can engage in game content and participate in a token economy. However, its overall score based on the fundamental analysis stands at 3.26 out of 10.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 5 out of 10

Despite achieving an impressive score in attracting followers and building sizeable communities, the ‚Äěfundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Marblex‚ÄĚ reveals a lack of activity and engagement from the administration and community members on social media platforms. Its media presence is also relatively weak, thus, limiting its reach to potential investors and users.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 5.1 out of 10

MARBLEX seems to maintain a decent level of security as reflected in the audit results. However, the project‚Äôs transparency and liquidity on exchanges need significant improvement, as revealed in the ‚Äěfundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Marblex.‚ÄĚ

TOKENOMICS: Score 2.4 out of 10

The tokenomics of MARBLEX leaves room for improvement. The project’s inflationary aspect and centralization of the monetary mass are areas that require attention to foster trust and enthusiasm among potential investors.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 3.8 out of 10

The project has made some progress towards its objectives and shows promise of bringing new developments. However, a more concrete plan and a track record of consistent achievements could help in boosting its credibility.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 1 out of 10

The experience of the team and the number of software developers are underwhelming, as per the ‚Äěfundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Marblex‚ÄĚ. It would greatly benefit from an experienced and robust team to lead the project and implement its vision.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 3.4 out of 10

Although the utility of tokens within the MARBLEX ecosystem is fairly satisfactory, the product’s overall utility is questionable. A clear and defined use-case scenario would aid in garnering more interest and adoption.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 1 out of 10

The number and quality of partners and investors involved in the project are currently minimal. Attracting reputable investors and partnering with renowned companies could provide a significant boost to the project’s credibility and outreach.

Fundamental analysis of the Marblex cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

The ‚Äěfundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Marblex‚ÄĚ presents a mixed picture. While the project shows promise in some areas such as social media attraction and community size, it lags significantly in areas like team experience, tokenomics, and partnerships. As it stands, the potential risk seems to outweigh the investment opportunities. However, given the dynamic nature of the cryptocurrency world, with concerted effort in addressing its weaknesses, MARBLEX could turn things around. Potential investors should conduct their due diligence before making any investment decisions.

The fundamental analysis shows that the project is still in its early stages and will need significant improvements to ensure its success. It would be beneficial for investors to keep an eye on this project as it develops, keeping in mind the current state of affairs as depicted in the ‚Äěfundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Marblex.‚ÄĚ

MARBLEX and its Technological Perspective MARBLEX, symbolized as MBX, is a token of the Klaytn Compatible Token (KCT) family, based on the Klaytn blockchain. This technology is renowned for its high performance, focusing mainly on high-speed transaction processing. The robustness of KCT, backed by the Istanbul BFT consensus algorithm, allows MBX to process game content transactions rapidly and transparently.

Usage of MBX in the MARBLEX Ecosystem MBX finds its application within the MARBLEX ecosystem, a dynamic playground for game developers, service providers, and publishers. The addition of the MBX token system has further enriched this gaming business ecosystem by introducing the role of a service provider. It enhances the gaming experience, allowing users to indulge in not just quality content, but also the surrounding token economy, offering them chances for profit-making while playing.

Netmarble and Its Role in the MBX Ecosystem Netmarble, the parent company of MARBLEX, has been a trendsetter in the global gaming market since 2000. Responsible for numerous hit games, it enriches the MBX ecosystem with high-quality content, aiming for a blend of gaming excitement and reasonable rewards. With MBX as its primary currency, the ecosystem facilitates free token exchange and swap, connecting all games and creating a unique blockchain game ecosystem through the MBX Wallet.

Future Prospects of the MBX Ecosystem¬†The MBX ecosystem aims to broaden its horizons, planning integration with various game genres, and expanding into the realms of NFT and metaverse. Within Netmarble‚Äôs MBX-based blockchain ecosystem, MBX intends to highlight ‚Äěfun‚ÄĚ, the core of gaming, while ensuring user participation and rational rewards.

Fundamental analysis of the cryptocurrency Marblex

MARBLEX - MBX performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

SCORE: 7.24
RATING: Good
Pixels - logo
SCORE: 7.42
RATING: Good
Heroes of Mavia - logo
SCORE: 6.65
RATING: Good
playdapp
SCORE: 5.17
RATING: Average
star-atlas
SCORE: 6.90
RATING: Good
beam logo
SCORE: 5.55
RATING: Average
playdapp
SCORE: 6.30
RATING: Good
metacade logo
SCORE: 6.43
RATING: Good
Big Time logo
SCORE: 4.65
RATING: Average
yield guild games logo
SCORE: ūüĒí
RATING: No rating
logo games for a living
SCORE: 6.13
RATING: Good
Logo Hello Labs
SCORE: 6.47
RATING: Good
Enjin coin logo
SCORE: 8.40
RATING: Excellent
SCORE: 6.39
RATING: Good
Gala - logo
SCORE: 7.65
RATING: Good
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good