Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 0.00% | Volume (24h): $42,813,574,301 | Market Cap: $2,606,859,732,213
Projects listed: 276 |
Sector
Exchange Debut
Market Cap
Maxim Supply
Circulating Supply
Circ. Supply(%)
Price
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
Orbs, established in 2017, emerges as a public blockchain infrastructure designed for mass-use applications, prioritizing scalability, security, and affordability. With an infrastructure that incorporates blockchain virtualization and randomized proof-of-stake (RPoS), the Orbs platform promises a future of decentralized and transparent solutions for large-scale enterprises. With a final score of 6.07 out of 10 from a fundamental analysis of the Orbs cryptocurrency, this offers an interesting perspective on the project’s current positioning and potential.
The fundamental analysis of the Orbs cryptocurrency suggests that its presence in social and media channels is relatively weak. The project struggles to attract and engage followers on its social media pages, garnering scores of 2 out of 10 in both attracting followers and community activity. However, a commendable presence in media and decent activities from the administrators are evident. But, to increase its outreach and bolster public trust, Orbs needs to emphasize stronger community engagement strategies.
A prominent strength of Orbs lies in its audit and security features. With a respectable score of 7 in the audit results and liquidity on exchanges, Orbs has demonstrated its commitment to transparency and network security. However, there’s room for improvement in terms of making information more transparent to the public.
Diving deeper into the fundamental analysis of the Orbs cryptocurrency, its tokenomics reveals potential areas of concern. The project’s inflationary nature, with an annual inflation score of 5 out of 10, combined with concerns over centralization of its monetary mass, indicates the need for refinements to ensure long-term stability.
Orbs seems to be making strides in developing its ecosystem, with decent scores in achieving objectives and planning for new developments. It’s essential for Orbs to continue focusing on these positive trajectories to remain relevant in the competitive blockchain space.
Undoubtedly, the team behind Orbs is its cornerstone. With an impressive 9.1 score on team experience, it’s evident that seasoned professionals are leading the charge. While the number of software developers could be enhanced, the current team showcases commendable expertise.
In terms of product and utility, the analysis portrays a balanced view. The product utility seems promising, but it would be crucial for the ORBS token to play a more integral role in the ecosystem for increased value proposition.
Partnerships and investors are key to any project’s success. While Orbs has a decent number of investors and quality partnerships, a more aggressive approach in this domain could prove beneficial.
The fundamental analysis of the Orbs cryptocurrency paints a picture of a project with solid foundational elements but with areas requiring attention. Its strong team and ecosystem development are commendable. However, for potential investors, it’s vital to note that improving its social media presence, refining its tokenomics, and fortifying partnerships could be pivotal for the project’s long-term success. Given the scores from the fundamental analysis, while there’s inherent risk as with any crypto investment, Orbs, with its unique value proposition and skilled team, offers a potential opportunity for discerning investors.
Orbs is a prominent public blockchain infrastructure offering a blend of scalability, affordability, performance, and security. Designed with large-scale applications in mind, this decentralized network promotes a transparent environment, proving beneficial for both enterprises and consumer applications.
The ORBS token, inherent to the Orbs protocol, stands as a pivotal aspect of the platform. It calculates application fees and fuels an incentive system to select network validators. This token ensures network integrity by being the exclusive payment mode on the platform. Founded in 2017 by a proficient team of engineers, businessmen, and scientists, the infrastructure boasts innovations like blockchain virtualization and randomized proof-of-stake (RPoS) to reinforce scalability.
Four visionaries lead Orbs: Daniel Peled, Tal Kol, Netta Korin, and Uriel Peled. Daniel, holding multiple degrees, also spearheads the fintech startup, PayKey. Tal Kol, a blockchain application maestro, has affiliations with esteemed institutions like the Technion and companies like Wix.com. With a Wall Street background, Netta Korin shifted her prowess from banking to philanthropy, playing a key advisory role in the Israeli government. Lastly, Uriel Peled, an influential tech figure in Israel, co-founded Visualead, later acquired by Alibaba.
Distinguishing Orbs is its compatibility with Ethereum, offering support for smart contracts. The synergy between Orbs and Ethereum empowers DApps on the platform, granting them access to an array of benefits. From enhanced security and liquidity to reduced tariffs and extensive payment infrastructure, Orbs emerges as a holistic blockchain solution.
In conclusion, the Fundamental Analysis of the Orbs – ORBS Cryptocurrency reveals a promising platform that merges the benefits of two powerful blockchains, driven by a team of experts in their respective fields.
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.
Name | Domain | Purpose | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
_ga | coin-score.ai | Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. | 2 years | HTTP |
Name | Domain | Purpose | Expiry | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
_ga_QJD5B840TY | coin-score.ai | --- | 2 years | --- |