Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 0.00% | Volume (24h): $42,707,933,837 | Market Cap: $2,606,514,097,609
Storj
STORJ
$0.36
Sector
Distributed Computing
Exchange Debut
2017-07-02
Market Cap
52,361,203
Maxim Supply
∞
Circulating Supply
143,787,439
Circ. Supply(%)
∞
Storj
STORJ
Price
$0.36
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
9677974
0.380448049565
0.349773586465
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
-3.3722
-7.5123
-7.6002
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
∞
143,787,439
∞
The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Storj – STORJ cryptocurrency:
Storj, a decentralized cloud storage platform, epitomizes innovation in the crypto realm. Its unique approach of combining cloud storage with blockchain technology has garnered a respectable overall score of 6.90 out of 10 in its fundamental analysis. This score reflects a balanced blend of strengths and areas needing improvement across various parameters. Notably, its utility in offering secure, encrypted storage solutions and the integration of STORJ tokens into its ecosystem stand out as significant achievements. As we delve into the detailed analysis of each criterion, the fundamental analysis of the Storj – STORJ cryptocurrency offers a comprehensive perspective on its potential and challenges.
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 4.4 out of 10
In terms of social and media presence, Storj scores moderately with a 4.4 out of 10. Its ability to attract followers on social media platforms is limited, scoring only 2 out of 10. However, it excels in media presence, achieving a perfect 10. This indicates a strong interest in the project from the media but a need to further engage and grow its online community.
AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 5.975 out of 10
The audit and security aspect of Storj reveals a score of 5.975 out of 10. The platform demonstrates moderate results in audits and excels in liquidity on exchanges, scoring 9 out of 10. This suggests a reliable level of security and transparency, essential for user trust in a decentralized storage solution.
TOKENOMICS: Score 5.5 out of 10
Storj’s token economy earns a score of 5.5 out of 10. It reflects a balanced approach to inflation and token distribution, scoring 5 and 7 out of 10, respectively. This indicates a well-considered strategy for managing its monetary mass, which is crucial for long-term sustainability.
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 7.7 out of 10
The ecosystem development of Storj is quite strong, scoring 7.7 out of 10. This is underpinned by its achievement of objectives and plans for future developments. It shows commitment to continuous improvement and expansion, essential for keeping pace in the dynamic crypto environment.
TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 8.2 out of 10
The team behind Storj scores an impressive 8.2 out of 10, reflecting their expertise and the significant number of software developers involved. This high score indicates a solid foundation for the project, given the critical role of a skilled team in driving innovation and addressing technical challenges.
PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 8.78 out of 10
In terms of product and utility, Storj shines with a score of 8.78 out of 10. The high utility of both the product and the tokens within the ecosystem highlights Storj’s practical value and user-centric approach. This score underscores the platform’s relevance and usefulness in the real world.
PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 7 out of 10
Storj’s partnerships and investor relations earn a score of 7 out of 10. While it has strong partnerships, it has room for improvement in attracting investors. This suggests a need for enhanced strategies to draw more investment and strengthen its financial backing.
Fundamental analysis of the Storj – STORJ cryptocurrency – The final conclusion
- Latest analysis update: December 25, 2023
Storj - STORJ performance
GENERAL CRITERIA:
Score
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Go to Methodology
Content description
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
