yield guild games logo
Yield Guild Games
YGG
$0.58

Sector

Gaming

Exchange Debut

2021-07-31

Market Cap

219,026,860

Maxim Supply

1,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

376,278,381

Circ. Supply(%)

37.63%
yield guild games logo

Yield Guild Games

YGG

Price

$0.58

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

219,026,860
2021-07-31

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

34219591
0.606670675444
0.575692759299

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

-0.119
-5.9667
-41.6363

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

1,000,000,000
376,278,381
37.63%

What is Yield Guild Games?

 

Origins and Leadership

Yield Guild Games (YGG) is a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) focused on non-fungible tokens (NFTs) within virtual worlds. It aims to form the globe’s most extensive virtual economy and distribute revenues among stakeholders. Founded by Manila-based game studio with leaders like Gabby Dizon, involved in Axie Infinity and Yearn Finance Communities, it also counts on Beryl Li, an entrepreneur with a strong background from Cambridge University and CapchainX, and Owl of Moistness, a proficient blockchain developer. Nolan Manalo spearheads their gaming operations.

Distinctive Features of YGG

YGG’s main revenue stems from NFT assets utilized directly or via a rental system. This model permits guild members to employ these assets and share in-game rewards with YGG. Non-guild members can also benefit by engaging in economic activities on in-game land owned as NFTs. The increased economic value of these assets translates to their NFT market value. Additionally, there’s a play-to-earn mechanism, rewarding users with native tokens for their in-game actions.

Security Protocols

To ensure the protection of assets and activities, YGG created a subDAO. Assets within this subDAO remain under the safeguarding of the YGG treasury, managed via a multisignature hardware wallet, guaranteeing optimal security. Furthermore, smart contracts enable the player community to utilize these assets efficiently.

Fundamental analysis of the Dynex - DNX cryptocurrency

Yield Guild Games - YGG performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

SCORE: 7.24
RATING: Good
Pixels - logo
SCORE: 7.42
RATING: Good
Heroes of Mavia - logo
SCORE: 6.65
RATING: Good
playdapp
SCORE: 5.17
RATING: Average
star-atlas
SCORE: 6.90
RATING: Good
beam logo
SCORE: 5.55
RATING: Average
playdapp
SCORE: 6.30
RATING: Good
metacade logo
SCORE: 6.43
RATING: Good
Big Time logo
SCORE: 4.65
RATING: Average
logo games for a living
SCORE: 6.13
RATING: Good
Logo Hello Labs
SCORE: 6.47
RATING: Good
Enjin coin logo
SCORE: 8.40
RATING: Excellent
SCORE: 6.39
RATING: Good
Gala - logo
SCORE: 7.65
RATING: Good
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
TNC Coin -Logo
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average