origintrail
OriginTrail
TRAC
$0.80

Sector

Artificial Intelligence

Exchange Debut

2018-01-25

Market Cap

306,250,367

Maxim Supply

500,000,000

Circulating Supply

382,798,499

Circ. Supply(%)

76.56%
origintrail

OriginTrail

TRAC

Price

$0.80

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

306,250,367
2018-01-25

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

2694807
0.859477695927
0.799722712566

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

-5.4166
5.7
48.4196

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

500,000,000
382,798,499
76.56%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the OriginTrail – TRAC cryptocurrency:

 

OriginTrail (TRAC) presents itself as an innovative ecosystem dedicated to establishing a trusted knowledge infrastructure for artificial intelligence, focusing on verifying information sources and enhancing discoverability of essential knowledge and real-world assets. Despite its noble aspirations and unique approaches, such as the Decentralized Knowledge Graph and Parachain, the fundamental analysis of the OriginTrail – TRAC cryptocurrency reveals mixed results. It scores a moderate 5.87 out of 10, reflecting varying degrees of success across different criteria, from social media presence to ecosystem development.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 4.4 out of 10

The fundamental analysis of the OriginTrail – TRAC cryptocurrency indicates a struggle in the social and media domain. The project’s ability to attract followers and community activity on social media is weak, scoring just 1 and 3 respectively. However, it excels in media presence with a score of 8, suggesting a notable discrepancy between media attention and social media engagement.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 4.6 out of 10

In terms of audit and security, TRAC shows an average performance. The transparency of information scores well at 7, but audit results and liquidity on exchanges are areas of concern, scoring below average. This mixed performance highlights the need for improved security and audit protocols.

TOKENOMICS: Score 7.7 out of 10

The fundamental analysis of the OriginTrail – TRAC cryptocurrency reveals strong tokenomics, scoring 7.7. The project manages inflation well and demonstrates a commendable degree of decentralization in its monetary mass, both scoring 8 out of 10. This indicates a robust economic foundation for the token.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 5.9 out of 10

The ecosystem development of OriginTrail is moderately successful, with an objective achievement score of 5 and a slightly better score for future developments. This suggests ongoing progress but also room for significant improvement.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 7.76 out of 10

The team behind TRAC is experienced, reflected in an 8.7 score. However, the number of software developers is a notable weakness, scoring only 4. This could imply potential challenges in rapid development or scaling.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 5.8 out of 10

In terms of product and utility, TRAC’s utility in the ecosystem is underwhelming at a score of 4, despite the product itself receiving a better evaluation of 7. This disparity suggests that while the product is solid, its integration into the ecosystem could be improved.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 4.75 out of 10

For partners and investors, the fundamental analysis of the OriginTrail – TRAC cryptocurrency shows modest results, with both the number and quality of partners and investors scoring just above average. This indicates a need for stronger collaborations and investor engagement.

Fundamental analysis of the OriginTrail – TRAC cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

The fundamental analysis of the OriginTrail – TRAC cryptocurrency paints a picture of a project with significant potential but also notable challenges. Its strong points lie in its tokenomics and the experience of its team, suggesting a solid foundation and leadership. However, areas such as social media engagement, ecosystem development, and partner relationships need significant enhancement. From an investment perspective, while TRAC shows promise, especially in its unique approach to AI and knowledge verification, potential investors should be cautious. The moderate overall score and specific weaknesses highlight risks that need to be considered. The future growth of TRAC will likely depend on its ability to improve in these weaker areas while capitalizing on its strengths in tokenomics and team expertise.

What is OriginTrail?

OriginTrail is an ecosystem dedicated to building a reliable knowledge infrastructure for artificial intelligence (AI). It combats misinformation in the AI era by verifying the origin of information and enhancing the discoverability of key knowledge and real-world assets (RWAs).

Core Features

  • Trusted Knowledge Infrastructure: OriginTrail ensures information authenticity, critical in the AI age.
  • Decentralized Knowledge Graph: This unique feature organizes and discovers trusted AI-ready Knowledge Assets.
  • Open-source Development: OriginTrail’s technical development is community-driven and open-source, encouraging collaboration.
  • Trace Alliance Partnership: This non-profit organization unites over 150 members globally for knowledge exchange and networking.

Unique Characteristics

  • Support from Leading Entities: Partnerships with organizations like the British Standards Institution, SCAN, Polkadot, and the EU Commission endorse OriginTrail’s credibility.
  • OriginTrail Parachain: A crucial infrastructure component, soon evolving into NeuroWeb, integral in implementing OriginTrail technology globally.

Development Phases and Goals

  • Metcalfe Phase: Aims to create the world’s largest verifiable web for AI with 100 billion Knowledge Assets, enhancing scalability by 100,000 times.
  • Convergence Stage: Focuses on leveraging AI advancements for autonomous knowledge mining, leading to an autonomous Decentralized Knowledge Graph (DKG).

Founders’ Vision

Žiga Drev, Tomaž Levak, and Branimir Rakić established OriginTrail to develop a decentralized knowledge graph for global enterprise and consumer use. They emphasized neutrality, inclusiveness, and usability in their development process.

Fundamental analysis of the OriginTrail - TRAC cryptocurrency

OriginTrail - TRAC performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

flux
SCORE: 6.60
RATING: Good
basic-attention-token logo
SCORE: 7.62
RATING: Good
0x0.ai logo
SCORE: 5.45
RATING: Average
Pink BNB - LOGO
SCORE: 6.06
RATING: Good
verasity logo
SCORE: 6.96
RATING: Good
ChainGPT - LOGO
SCORE: 7.53
RATING: Good
humans ai logo
SCORE: 4.90
RATING: Average
Ocean Protocol - logo
SCORE: 7.82
RATING: Good
SCORE: 7.90
RATING: Good
Fundamental analysis of the Matrix AI Network cryptocurrency
SCORE: 5.92
RATING: Average
fundamental-analysis-of-the-atificial-liquid-intelligence-cryptocurrency
SCORE: 5.71
RATING: Average
SCORE: 7.28
RATING: Good
SCORE: 8.03
RATING: Excellent