Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 51.43% | Volume (24h): $40,859,031,734 | Market Cap: $2,206,480,194,612
NEO
NEO
$9.36
Sector
Smart Contracts
Exchange Debut
2016-09-09
Market Cap
660,428,399
Maxim Supply
100,000,000
Circulating Supply
70,530,000
Circ. Supply(%)
70.53%
NEO
NEO
Price
$9.36
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
10877748
9.676556860835
9.322330113117
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
-1.1102
1.139
-2.3491
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
100,000,000
70,530,000
70.53%
The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the NEO-NEO cryptocurrency:
NEO, an open-source, community-driven blockchain platform, emerges as a robust contender in the decentralized application space. It stands out with its feature-complete environment, empowering developers to digitize and automate asset management using smart contracts. Its integrated infrastructures like decentralized storage, oracles, and domain name services pave the way for a new internet era. In the fundamental analysis of the NEO-NEO cryptocurrency, this project achieves a solid overall score of 7.03 out of 10, reflecting its diverse strengths and areas for improvement.
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 6.7 out of 10
In the realm of social and media, NEO scored a 6.7 out of 10. This area highlights its strong media presence and ability to attract social media followers, both scoring a perfect 10. However, the activities of social media administrators and community engagement on these platforms were less impressive, scoring 4 and 2, respectively. This suggests a need for more proactive community management to foster engagement.
AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 7.08 out of 10
NEO’s audit and security aspect garnered a 7.08 out of 10. This score reflects a balance between decent audit results and high liquidity on exchanges, along with moderate transparency of public information. Ensuring continuous improvement in these areas is vital for maintaining trust and security.
TOKENOMICS: Score 7 out of 10
The token economy of NEO scored 7 out of 10, indicating a balanced tokenomics structure. While the project manages inflation well, with a high score of 8, its centralization of monetary mass is more concerning, scoring only 4. This highlights the need for a more decentralized approach to its monetary policy.
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 7.32 out of 10
In ecosystem development, NEO scored 7.32 out of 10. The project shows commitment to achieving its objectives and bringing new developments, scoring 7 and 7.8, respectively. This reflects a progressive approach towards evolving and expanding its ecosystem.
TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 6.6 out of 10
NEO’s team and developers earned a 6.6 out of 10. The team’s experience is commendable with a score of 7, but the number of software developers, scoring 5, indicates potential room for growth in the development team to expedite and enhance project outcomes.
PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 7.08 out of 10
In terms of product and utility, NEO achieved a 7.08 out of 10. The utility of the product is high, scoring 7.8, but the utility of tokens within the ecosystem needs improvement, scoring 6. This suggests a need for better integration of tokens into the platform’s functionalities.
PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 7.25 out of 10
The partners and investors aspect scored 7.25 out of 10. Both the number and capacity of investors, and the quality of partners, are above average, scoring 7 and 7.5, respectively. This signifies solid support and collaboration, essential for the project’s growth.
Fundamental analysis of the NEO-NEO cryptocurrency – The final conclusion
The fundamental analysis of the NEO-NEO cryptocurrency reveals a project with significant potential, marked by a strong technological foundation and diverse functionalities. Its overall score of 7.03 out of 10 reflects a balance of strengths and areas needing improvement. While its presence in social media and media, along with a strong ecosystem and reliable partners, are commendable, it faces challenges in community engagement, decentralization of its token economy, and expansion of its development team. These aspects, if addressed, could enhance NEO’s position in the competitive blockchain environment. Investors should consider these factors, weighing the project’s solid foundation against areas for growth, in assessing its investment potential and risk.
- Latest analysis update: December 22, 2023
NEO - NEO performance
GENERAL CRITERIA:
Score
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Go to Methodology
Content description
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
