Ark
ARK
$0.86

Sector

Platform

Exchange Debut

2017-03-27

Market Cap

154,102,028

Maxim Supply

Circulating Supply

179,035,638

Circ. Supply(%)

ark

Ark

ARK

Price

$0.86

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

154,102,028
2017-03-27

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

5835231
0.951827088218
0.86442352331

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

-4.6373
-1.7042
18.6523

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

179,035,638

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Ark-ARK cryptocurrency:

 

Based on a thorough fundamental analysis of the Ark cryptocurrency, ARK emerges as a multifaceted blockchain-based development platform. Launched in 2016 and going live in 2017, the ARK Ecosystem is grounded in an open-source technology stack and a variety of entities contributing to its advancement. Despite its impressive architecture, its overall score from the analysis stands at 5.34 out of 10, suggesting a mix of strengths and areas for potential improvement.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 3 out of 10

Ark’s presence in the social and mass media spectrum leaves room for growth. The ability to magnetize followers stands at a moderate 3 out of 10, indicating the need for enhanced engagement. The administrators show reasonable activity, yet the community engagement is low. Moreover, media exposure and community sizes on chat groups remain below average, signaling an opportunity to ramp up outreach and community-building initiatives.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 4.45 out of 10

The fundamental analysis of the Ark cryptocurrency reveals that security and transparency are areas with potential for enhancement. While liquidity on exchanges appears decent, the audit results and available public information transparency need bolstering to ensure user confidence.

TOKENOMICS: Score 5.45 out of 10

In the realm of token economy, the project exhibits an inflationary model with a score of 4 out of 10. Notably, the concentration of the monetary mass leans towards centralization, as reflected in the higher score of 8 out of 10, offering a unique economic dynamic in the ecosystem.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 6.4 out of 10

ARK’s ecosystem development is one of its strengths. Achieving set objectives and planning for future developments both score 6 out of 10, showcasing the team’s commitment to the project’s continuous evolution.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 6.8 out of 10

The strength of the ARK project significantly hinges on its experienced team, scoring an impressive 8 out of 10. However, the relatively low number of software developers indicates a need for expanding the team to cater to its vast ecosystem better.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 5.2 out of 10

Within the scope of utility, the fundamental analysis of the Ark cryptocurrency elucidates a moderate score. The overall utility of the product and the specific roles of tokens within the ecosystem present a balanced view, signifying both its potential and areas to refine.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 6.25 out of 10

Partnerships and investments provide a decent backing for ARK. While the project has a commendable number of quality partners, the capacity and numbers of investors could benefit from expansion, enhancing its financial stability and outreach.

Fundamental analysis of the Ark-ARK cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

Delving into the fundamental analysis of the Ark cryptocurrency showcases a project with immense potential. With an overall score of 5.34 out of 10, ARK has several strengths, particularly in team expertise, ecosystem development, and partnerships. However, like many nascent technologies, it has areas needing improvement, particularly in community engagement, security, and transparency. For potential investors, while the risk associated with ARK is moderate given its current scores, the opportunities for growth and development suggest it could be a valuable addition to a diversified portfolio, especially if the team addresses the identified areas of improvement. It’s vital for investors to stay updated on ARK’s strides in enhancing its ecosystem and expanding its community, as these will be pivotal in its future trajectory.

What is Ark-ARK?

ARK’s Emergence in the Crypto Landscape

ARK, a robust cryptocurrency and blockchain development platform, debuted in 2016, securing $800K through a Token Exchange Campaign. With its foundations rooted in financial prudence, ARK rapidly established itself as a financially stable entity. By March 2017, the ARK Public Network was operational, introducing its native crypto asset and marking the birth of the business division, ARK ECOSYSTEM SCIC, often identified as ‘ARK.io’.

Technical Aspects and Offerings

The ARK Ecosystem leverages an open-source blockchain infrastructure, primarily coded in TypeScript. Serving as a testament to ARK’s capabilities, the public network encompasses an array of specialized transaction types, including multi-payment and IPFS hash transactions. The standout, ARK’s Launcher, facilitates seamless blockchain creation via a user-friendly interface. This intuitive tool empowers developers to harness ARK’s consensus mechanism, tech stack, and bespoke transactions.

Addressing Blockchain Complexities

A core goal of ARK is demystifying the intricacies associated with blockchain adoption. Its Core Framework, a beacon for developers, oversees various operations like P2P interactions and ledger database oversight. A gem within this framework is the Generic Transaction Interface (GTI), which paves the way for customized blockchain transactions, all without the steep learning curve of a new language.

Engaging with ARK’s Network

Unlike traditional mining, ARK employs a delegated proof-of-stake system. Here, 51 forging delegates oversee the network, with block creation rewarding 2 ARK per delegate. Token holders play a pivotal role in electing these delegates, thereby mitigating centralization risks. Interaction with the public network, including voting, is facilitated via ARK’s Desktop or Mobile wallets, ensuring user autonomy in the process.

In essence, ARK Cryptocurrency is a game-changer, pioneering innovations and simplifying blockchain accessibility for all.

Fundamental analysis of the ark cryptocurrency

Ark - ARK performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

cartesi
SCORE: 6.28
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.84
RATING: Average
polymath-network logo
SCORE: 6.46
RATING: Good
tezos logo
SCORE: 7.41
RATING: Good
artt network logo
SCORE: 3.65
RATING: Fragile
JasmyCoin LOGO
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
0x protocol logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
cobak token logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
Powerledger logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
logo harmony
SCORE: 8.05
RATING: Excellent
SCORE: 7.03
RATING: Good
Arkham - logo
SCORE: 4.87
RATING: Average
Cosmos- logo
SCORE: 7.86
RATING: Good
SCORE: 7.53
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.99
RATING: Average
Fundamental analysis of the BinaryX cryptocurrency
SCORE: 5.80
RATING: Average