Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 0.00% | Volume (24h): $36,776,399,544 | Market Cap: $2,562,972,839,609
Cartesi
CTSI
$0.15
Sector
Platform
Exchange Debut
2020-04-20
Market Cap
125,043,904
Maxim Supply
1,000,000,000
Circulating Supply
823,756,435
Circ. Supply(%)
82.38%
Cartesi
CTSI
Price
$0.15
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
3952750
0.157218376537
0.150619305245
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
-3.4261
-4.7352
-5.1797
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
1,000,000,000
823,756,435
82.38%
The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Cartesi – CTSI cryptocurrency:
Cartesi – CTSI emerges as a distinctive player in the crypto world, pioneering an app-specific rollup protocol with a Linux-compatible virtual machine. This innovative approach broadens the horizon for DApp developers, offering a versatile and secure platform. Its rollups, adaptable as L2, L3, or sovereign layers, ensure robust base layer security. The project’s overall fundamental analysis score of 6.28 out of 10 reflects its potential and areas for growth.
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 5.1 out of 10
The Cartesi project exhibits a moderate presence in the realm of social and mass media. Despite a notable presence in media (8/10), it struggles with attracting and engaging followers on social media (3/10 in both attracting followers and community activity). The activities of social media administrators are somewhat effective (6/10), with a moderate-sized community on chat groups (5/10). These aspects indicate a need for enhanced engagement strategies to bolster its online presence.
AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 7.9 out of 10
Cartesi’s focus on audit and security is commendable, scoring 7.9 out of 10. The project shows strong results in audits (8.5/10) and liquidity on exchanges (8/10), underscoring its reliability and stability. However, there is room for improvement in the transparency of information available to the public (5/10), which is crucial for trust and investor confidence.
TOKENOMICS: Score 6.9 out of 10
The token economy of Cartesi is fairly robust, with a score of 6.9 out of 10. The project is marked by a controlled inflation rate (8/10), indicating a sustainable economic model. However, the centralization of the monetary mass (6/10) suggests a need for more decentralized governance or distribution mechanisms.
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 5.9 out of 10
In terms of ecosystem development, Cartesi scores 5.9 out of 10. The project has made some progress towards achieving its objectives (5/10) and plans for new developments (6/10). These scores reflect a steady but not rapid pace of growth and innovation in the ecosystem.
TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 5.92 out of 10
The Cartesi team, with a score of 5.92 out of 10, shows a mix of strengths and areas for improvement. The team’s experience is rated at 6.4 out of 10, indicating a competent but not exceptionally seasoned group. The lower score for the number of software developers (4/10) suggests a need for expanding the technical team to accelerate development and innovation.
PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 7.08 out of 10
Cartesi’s product and utility score of 7.08 out of 10 reflects a strong foundation. The utility of the product itself scores high (7.8/10), demonstrating its effectiveness and relevance. However, the utility of tokens within the ecosystem (6/10) indicates potential for greater integration and usage of the token within its ecosystem.
PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 5 out of 10
In the domain of partners and investors, Cartesi has a moderate performance with a score of 5 out of 10. While the number and capacity of investors are somewhat promising (6/10), the number and quality of partners (4/10) suggest a need for strategic alliances and collaborations to enhance growth and market penetration.
Fundamental analysis of the Cartesi – CTSI – HOLD cryptocurrency – The final conclusion
- Latest analysis update: December 25, 2023
Cartesi - CTSI performance
GENERAL CRITERIA:
Score
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Go to Methodology
Content description
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
