tezos logo
Tezos
XTZ
$0.79

Sector

Platform

Exchange Debut

2017-10-02

Market Cap

776,973,354

Maxim Supply

Circulating Supply

989,347,274

Circ. Supply(%)

tezos logo

Tezos

XTZ

Price

$0.79

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

776,973,354
2017-10-02

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

8043675
0.794597788634
0.779722097528

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

0.3934
8.1983
-7.1142

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

989,347,274

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Tezos-XTZ cryptocurrency:

 

Tezos (XTZ) emerges as a unique blockchain network focusing on smart contracts, positioning itself as a dynamic alternative to the likes of Ethereum and Bitcoin with its advanced, evolving infrastructure. This adaptability, emphasizing avoidance of hard forks, is a standout feature, bolstered by the democratic involvement of XTZ holders in protocol upgrades. The fundamental analysis of the Tezos – XTZ cryptocurrency reveals an overall score of 7.41 out of 10, indicating a robust project with diverse strengths and areas for improvement.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 6.8 out of 10

In terms of social and media presence, Tezos shows a mixed performance. Its exceptional ability to attract followers and presence in the media, both scoring a perfect 10, highlights its strong public appeal and media footprint. However, this contrasts with a low community activity score of 1, suggesting a need for more engaging and active community involvement on social media platforms.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 7.75 out of 10

The audit and security aspect of Tezos is quite solid, with an encouraging score of 8.5 in audit results. This reflects a reliable and secure framework. However, the transparency of information available to the public, scoring 5, suggests a potential area for increased openness and clarity to bolster public trust and understanding.

TOKENOMICS: Score 8 out of 10

Tezos exhibits a strong token economy, balancing inflation and centralization effectively. The project’s inflationary nature is well-managed, as reflected in the high score of 9, while a score of 7 in monetary mass centralization indicates a reasonable level of decentralization in its economic structure.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 7.1 out of 10

The ecosystem development of Tezos is progressing, with objectives being moderately met (6.2) and plans for new developments (6.8). This suggests a forward-moving trajectory, albeit with room for more accelerated growth and achievement.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 7.84 out of 10

The team behind Tezos, particularly its software developers who scored a perfect 10, is highly capable. The slightly lower score in team experience (7.3) implies a mix of seasoned and newer talent, fostering a balance of expertise and fresh perspectives.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 6.8 out of 10

The utility of Tezos’ product scores a strong 8, indicating its practical applicability and relevance in the crypto space. However, the utility of tokens within its ecosystem, scoring 5, suggests a need for enhancing token functionality and integration into the broader Tezos framework.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 8.5 out of 10

Tezos stands out in its partnerships and investor relations, scoring an impressive 8.5 in both the number and quality of investors and partners. This reflects a strong, supportive network that can drive the project’s growth and stability.

Fundamental analysis of the Tezos-XTZ cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

The fundamental analysis of the Tezos – XTZ cryptocurrency highlights a project with significant potential, marked by its innovative approach to blockchain infrastructure and strong community and media presence. However, challenges remain, especially in fostering more active community engagement and enhancing token utility within its ecosystem. With a final score of 7.41, Tezos presents as a promising investment opportunity, yet one that requires careful consideration of its evolving dynamics and areas for improvement. The balanced team expertise, robust security measures, and strong partnerships form a solid foundation, but ongoing developments and community dynamics should be monitored closely by potential investors.

What is Tezos?

 

Introduction to Tezos

Tezos is a smart contract-based blockchain network, akin to Ethereum but with a notable difference. It offers an advanced, evolving infrastructure designed to prevent hard forks, a challenge faced by Bitcoin and Ethereum. Tezos allows XTZ holders to vote on developers’ proposed protocol upgrades, emphasizing community involvement in governance.

Development and Founders

Arthur Breitman, under the pseudonym L. M. Goodman, authored the Tezos white paper in 2014. He highlighted Bitcoin’s governance weaknesses and the inability to issue new tokens. Arthur, with Kathleen Breitman, founded Dynamic Ledger Solutions to develop Tezos’ underlying code, later acquired by the Tezos Foundation.

Unique Features of Tezos

Tezos stands out for its “baking” process, a unique form of staking involving 8,000 XTZ. Bakers participate in governance, voting on blockchain code changes over a 23-day, four-step procedure. High-profile businesses, like Societe Generale and major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, support Tezos staking, a feature not widely available in other cryptocurrencies.

Security Mechanisms

Tezos employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism. Validators, by making a security deposit, contribute to network integrity. Rewards incentivize honest behavior, while dishonest actions risk the loss of stakes.

Conclusion

Tezos’ commitment to secure, upgradable infrastructure and its innovative governance model through staking and baking positions it as a futureproof blockchain technology. Its adoption by significant financial institutions and support from top cryptocurrency exchanges underscores its potential in the evolving digital asset landscape.

 

Fundamental analysis of the Tezos-XTZ cryptocurrency

Tezos - XTZ performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

cartesi
SCORE: 6.28
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.84
RATING: Average
polymath-network logo
SCORE: 6.46
RATING: Good
artt network logo
SCORE: 3.65
RATING: Fragile
JasmyCoin LOGO
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
0x protocol logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
cobak token logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
Powerledger logo
SCORE: 🔒
RATING: No rating
logo harmony
SCORE: 8.05
RATING: Excellent
SCORE: 7.03
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.34
RATING: Average
Arkham - logo
SCORE: 4.87
RATING: Average
Cosmos- logo
SCORE: 7.86
RATING: Good
SCORE: 7.53
RATING: Good
SCORE: 5.99
RATING: Average
Fundamental analysis of the BinaryX cryptocurrency
SCORE: 5.80
RATING: Average