Projects listed: 276 |
BTC Dominance: 49.11% | Volume (24h): $32,770,673,789 | Market Cap: $2,449,351,917,700
Lisk
LSK
$1.02
Sector
Smart Contracts
Exchange Debut
2016-04-06
Market Cap
148,368,236
Maxim Supply
∞
Circulating Supply
144,818,773
Circ. Supply(%)
∞
Lisk
LSK
Price
$1.02
Market Cap
Sector
Exchange Debut
Volume 24h
High 24h
Low 24h
1120417
1.052899904782
1.023755780844
Change 24h
Change 7d
Change 30d
-0.9289
1.5248
-38.7193
Maxim supply
Circulating supply
Circulating supply(%)
∞
144,818,773
∞
The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the Lisk – LSK cryptocurrency:
Lisk (LSK) emerges as a noteworthy player in the cryptocurrency domain, aiming to revolutionize the Web3 and crypto landscape by attracting over 100 million users. This blockchain application platform, underpinned by its industry-leading JavaScript SDK, stands out with its dedication to accessibility and developer friendliness. The Lisk SDK, a cornerstone since 2019, empowers developers to craft application-specific blockchains in JavaScript, the most prevalent programming language globally. Despite its innovative approach and robust technology, the fundamental analysis of the Lisk – LSK cryptocurrency reveals a mixed performance across various criteria, culminating in an overall score of 6.06 out of 10.
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 5.6 out of 10
Lisk’s engagement in social and media channels reflects a moderate performance. While it shows a strong presence in media with a score of 9 out of 10, its community activity on social media pages lags behind, scoring only 2 out of 10. This disparity suggests a need for increased focus on fostering community engagement and interaction on social platforms.
AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 3.9 out of 10
Audit and security aspects of Lisk present concerns, as indicated by its low score of 3.9 out of 10. The audit results, scoring a mere 3 out of 10, highlight potential vulnerabilities or lack of robust security protocols, underscoring an area requiring immediate attention to bolster investor confidence.
TOKENOMICS: Score 6.05 out of 10
The token economy of Lisk shows a balanced performance with a score of 6.05 out of 10. Its high score in inflation management contrasts sharply with its low decentralization score, indicating a significant concentration of tokens, which could raise concerns about centralization and control within the ecosystem.
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 6.4 out of 10
In terms of ecosystem development, Lisk scores a promising 6.4 out of 10. The project’s commitment to achieving objectives and planning future developments is evident, though there is room for improvement in the execution and delivery of these goals.
TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 5.6 out of 10
The team behind Lisk earns a score of 5.6 out of 10. While the number of software developers is commendable, the overall experience of the team is perceived as average. Investing in experienced talent could accelerate the project’s growth and innovation.
PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 7.78 out of 10
Lisk’s product utility scores an impressive 7.78 out of 10. The high utility of its product and tokens within the ecosystem signifies a strong foundation for practical applications, potentially driving user adoption and long-term viability.
PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 5.25 out of 10
The project’s partnerships and investor relations garner a moderate score of 5.25 out of 10. Strengthening these areas could enhance Lisk’s market presence and fuel further development.
Fundamental analysis of the Lisk – LSK cryptocurrency – The final conclusion
What is Lisk – LSK?
Lisk aims to integrate 100,000,000 users into crypto and web3. It offers an accessible blockchain application platform and a JavaScript SDK. The Lisk SDK, launched in 2019, allows developers to create application-specific blockchains using JavaScript. The Lisk blockchain application platform, set for release in 2022, will enable interoperability among various blockchain applications, including DeFi, NFT, and Metaverse.
The Vision and Development of Lisk
Lisk’s importance is highlighted in videos like “The Case for Lisk” and “The Ultimate Vision for Lisk.” Its journey is captured in “Looking Back on Lisk.” Managed by the Lisk Foundation in Switzerland, it focuses on legal and financial compliance. Lightcurve GmbH, a Berlin-based blockchain studio, develops Lisk products with a team of over 40 experts.
Security and Efficiency of the Lisk Network
Secured by a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) consensus algorithm and BFT protocol, Lisk ensures environmental friendliness and efficiency. Its low electricity consumption and high security are notable. Since its network launch in 2016, Lisk has maintained smooth operations through development standards, test coverage, and regular security audits. Users can inspect the Lisk network through blockchain explorers like LiskScan.com and Lisk.Observer.
Founders and Contributions
Lisk was co-founded by Max Kordek and Oliver Beddows. Max Kordek, CEO of Lisk, is a recognized crypto entrepreneur. He co-founded Lightcurve and has been active in the global crypto community. Oliver Beddows, CTO of Lisk, is a seasoned crypto developer. He has contributed to making Lisk a premier platform for JavaScript developers.
Accessibility and Innovation
Lisk emphasizes accessibility, aiming to make crypto and web3 available to everyone. Established in 2016, it’s one of the oldest crypto projects, known for consistent development and substantial funding. By enabling developers to build blockchain applications on their own chains with the Lisk SDK, Lisk avoids scalability issues and high fees, while maintaining composability through interoperability.
- Latest analysis update: December 24, 2023
Lisk - LSK performance
GENERAL CRITERIA:
Score
SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
Go to Methodology
Content description
Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.
Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is, at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.
Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.
Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.
Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.
Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.
Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.
