FLOKI
FLOKI
$0.00

Sector

Meme

Exchange Debut

2021-07-11

Market Cap

1,669,327,648

Maxim Supply

10,000,000,000,000

Circulating Supply

9,692,499,518,132

Circ. Supply(%)

96.92%
floki

FLOKI

FLOKI

Price

$0.00

Market Cap

Sector

Exchange Debut

1,669,327,648
2021-07-11

Volume 24h

High 24h

Low 24h

188458206
0.000184298222
0.000169961722

Change 24h

Change 7d

Change 30d

-0.4615
0.1953
-35.4775

Maxim supply

Circulating supply

Circulating supply(%)

10,000,000,000,000
9,692,499,518,132
96.92%

The opinion of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the fundamental analysis of the FLOKI-FLOKI cryptocurrency:

 

FLOKI, known as the people’s cryptocurrency and an offshoot of the Shiba Inu (SHIB) community, stands out in the digital financial space with its innovative suite of products that include the Valhalla NFT gaming metaverse, FlokiFi finance products, FlokiPlaces marketplace, and the University of Floki. With a robust social presence and partnerships with crypto leaders like Chainlink, its journey is being closely watched by crypto enthusiasts. However, a fundamental analysis of the FLOKI cryptocurrency reveals a mixed bag of strengths and weaknesses, with an overall score of 5.87 out of 10.

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA: Score 8.7 out of 10

FLOKI excels in the social and media front. Its ability to attract followers and the proactive role of its administrators are commendable. While its presence in the media and sizeable chat group communities are also impressive, there’s a noticeable lack in community activity on their social media pages.

AUDIT & SECURITY: Score 6.85 out of 10

On the audit and security spectrum, the results are satisfactory. Positive audit results and commendable liquidity on exchanges contribute to its score. However, the fundamental analysis of the FLOKI cryptocurrency reveals a need for better transparency of public information.

TOKENOMICS: Score 4.25 out of 10

Token economy remains an area of concern for FLOKI. An inflationary project with limited clarity on its annual inflation rate pulls its score down, even though its centralized monetary mass remains strong.

ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Score 6.72 out of 10

FLOKI shows promise in ecosystem development. The project has been successful in achieving its objectives and seems poised for future developments.

TEAM & DEVELOPERS: Score 2.6 out of 10

While the project boasts a good number of software developers, concerns arise when assessing the overall experience of the team, which needs bolstering to improve this metric in the fundamental analysis of the FLOKI cryptocurrency.

PRODUCT & UTILITY: Score 4.8 out of 10

In terms of product and utility, while the token finds a decent utility within its ecosystem, the overall utility of the product appears limited.

PARTNERS & INVESTORS: Score 6.75 out of 10

FLOKI enjoys a decent backing in terms of partners and investors. The caliber of its investors and quality of partners adds value to the project.

Fundamental analysis of the FLOKI-FLOKI cryptocurrency – The final conclusion

After a meticulous fundamental analysis of the FLOKI cryptocurrency, it’s evident that FLOKI exhibits both strengths, particularly in social media presence and ecosystem development, as well as significant weaknesses. One of the most concerning negatives revolves around the project’s team. The fact that the team remains undisclosed and the project leaders operate under pseudonyms can raise questions regarding transparency and the trust of potential investors. This, combined with other areas needing improvement like tokenomics, underscores the need for cautious monitoring for those considering investment in FLOKI. Potential investors should evaluate these factors diligently to gauge the risk and opportunity this project presents. The future trajectory of FLOKI remains uncertain and warrants careful scrutiny.

What is FLOKI-FLOKI?

Introduction to Floki

Floki Inu, often referred to as “Floki”, distinguishes itself as a people’s digital currency within the broader crypto ecosystem. Rooted in the Shiba Inu community, its inspiration derives from Elon Musk’s own Shiba Inu named Floki. Interestingly, Musk has openly acknowledged his support for Dogecoin, but never claimed ownership of SHIB.

The Utility Behind Floki

Beyond its meme status, Floki prioritizes functionality. Key initiatives in the Floki universe comprise an NFT gaming realm dubbed Valhalla, a collection of decentralized finance tools under “FlokiFi”, the NFT and merchandise portal “FlokiPlaces”, and an educational hub named “University of Floki”. These ventures emphasize Floki’s ambition to merge entertainment with real-world application, taking cues from breakthrough blockchain games such as Axie Infinity.

A Community-Driven Endeavor

The narrative surrounding Floki’s inception is particularly compelling. Initially brought to life by an unknown developer who quickly departed, the project was resuscitated by its fervent community, now self-identifying as “Floki Vikings”. Within its inaugural year, this reborn initiative saw an impressive surge, amassing over 400,000 holders. Steering the ship are key players like B, Sabre, MrBrown Whale, and the acclaimed blockchain veteran Jackie Xu.

Ensuring Floki’s Security

Two dominant blockchains play a pivotal role in Floki’s operation: Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain. As an ERC-20 token on Ethereum, it leverages Ethereum’s robust proof-of-work mechanism. Concurrently, as a BEP-20 asset on BSC, it harnesses the proof-of-stake system, bolstered by 21 daily-elected validators.

To truly grasp the potential and trajectory of the FLOKI Cryptocurrency, one must delve into its unique blend of community spirit, innovative utilities, and stringent security measures.

Fundamental analysis of the floki cryptocurrency

FLOKI - FLOKI performance

GENERAL CRITERIA:

Score

SOCIAL & MASS MEDIA
0
AUDIT & SECURITY
0
TOKENOMICS
0
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
0
TEAM & DEVELOPERS
0
PRODUCT & UTILITY
0
PARTNERS & INVESTORS
0
Content description – Go to Metholodogy

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Go to Methodology

Content description

Social & Mass Media In this section was taken into consideration the intensity of the activity of the social media page of the administrators , the speed of the community growth, the user interaction with the pages and as well the number of media appearances in the most important trade publications.

Audit & Security In particular, the team looks if the project is audited, how extensive the audit is,  at the bug bounty program, if it had incidents or not, at the liquidity on the exchanges and at the transparency of the information provided.

Tokenomics Under this criterion it is analyzed whether the project is inflationary or not, whether it has maximum supply, the percentage of supply released into the market at the time of the analysis, the rate of inflation per year, the distribution of supply in the portfolios as well as the vesting plan.

Ecosistem Development In this section is checked if the project has delivered on time what it proposed in the roadmap, the degree of participation in the project governance of the community, the activity and intensity of the developments published on github and what products or applications the team proposes to develop in the future.

Team & Developers It checks if the team is public, the quality of the team behind the project, the number of members on different domains, the experience in IT, finance and cryptography, the traceability of published information about team members and as well the number of developers in the project.

Product & Utility It checks if there are functional products, the number of users and the revenues generated by these products, the sustainability of the project and the usefulness offered in the cryptographic space and as well as in other fields of activity.

Partners & Investors It analyzes the partners and the degree of their involvement in the project, the capacity of investors and investment funds that can contribute substantially to the development of the ecosystem.

Related projects

analos logo
SCORE: 4.29
RATING: Average
PawStars LOGO
SCORE: 4.84
RATING: Average
TokenFi LOGO
SCORE: 4.30
RATING: Average
memecoin logo
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
wall street memes logo
SCORE: 5.10
RATING: Average
SCORE: 6.19
RATING: Good
Catgirl - logo
SCORE: 4.71
RATING: Average
PEPE 2.0 - logo
SCORE: 4.17
RATING: Average
Shiba Inu - logo
SCORE: 6.12
RATING: Good
Dogecoin - logo
SCORE: 6.01
RATING: Good
PEPE - Logo
SCORE: 5.16
RATING: Average
fundamental-analysis-of-the-milady-meme-coin-cryptocurrency
SCORE: 3.99
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.59
RATING: Fragile
SCORE: 3.04
RATING: Fragile